Material
scientists are in need of experimental techniques that
facilitate a quantitative mechanical characterization of mesoscale
materials and, therefore, their rational design. An example is that
of thin organic films, as their performance often relates to their
ability to withstand use without damage. The mechanical characterization
of thin films has benefited from the emergence of the atomic force
microscope (AFM). In this regard, it is of relevance that most soft
materials are not elastic but viscoelastic instead. While most AFM
operation modes and analysis procedures are suitable for elasticity
studies, the use of AFM for quantitative viscoelastic characterizations
is still a challenge. This is now an emerging topic due to recent
developments in contact resonance AFM. The aim of this work was to
further explore the potential of this technique by investigating its
sensitivity to viscoelastic changes induced by environmental parameters,
specifically humidity. Here, we show that by means of this experimental
approach, it was possible to quantitatively monitor the influence
of humidity on the viscoelasticity of two different thin and hydrophobic
polyurethane coatings representative of those typically used to protect
materials from processes like weathering and wear. The technique was
sensitive even to the transition between the antiplasticizing and
plasticizing effects of ambient humidity. Moreover, we showed that
this was possible without the need of externally exciting the AFM
cantilever or the sample, i.e., just by monitoring the Brownian motion
of cantilevers, which significantly facilitates the implementation
of this technique in any AFM setup.
Water-based copolymer dispersions were prepared using methyl methacrylate (MMA), ethyl acrylate (EA) (MMA/EA = 1:2), and a series of nonionic polymerizable surfactants, i.e., "surfmers" based on poly(ethylene glycol)-(meth)acrylates. The latexes were compared with the behavior of a conventionally stabilized (nonionic nonylphenol ethoxylate, NP100 with 84 ethylene oxide units) dispersion with the same MMA-EA composition (PMMAEA). A number of techniques were employed in order to characterize structure, dynamics, and film formation properties: solution/solid-state NMR, dynamic/static light scattering (DLS/SLS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile/shear mode dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The surfmers were found to be miscible with the MMA-EA copolymer at room temperature, with 46-85 mol % of the reacted surfmer detected at the particle surfaces, and the remaining part buried in the particle bulk. In contrast, the NP100 surfactant formed a separate interphase between the copolymer particles with no mixing detected at room temperature or at 90 degrees C. For a 4.0% dry weight concentration, NP100 phase separated and further crystallized at room temperature over a period of several months. Composition fluctuations related to a limited blockiness on a length scale above approximately 2 nm were detected for PMMAEA particles, whereas the surfmer particles were found to be homogeneous also below this limit. On a particle-particle level, the dispersions tended to form colloidal crystals unless hindered by a broadened particle size distribution or, in the case of PMMAEA, by the action of NP100. Finally, a surface roughness (Rq) master plot was constructed for data above the glass transition temperature (Tg) from Tg + 11 degrees C to Tg + 57 degrees C and compared with the complex shear modulus over 11 frequency decades. Shift factors from the 2 methods obeyed the same Williams-Landel-Ferry (WLF) temperature dependence, thus connecting the long-time surface flattening process to the rheological behavior of the copolymer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.