Purpose: To review the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) in Hong Kong patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CRAO with symptom onset ≤6 hours who failed emergency bedside ocular treatment were referred to a course of HBOT. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (VA) after HBOT and adverse effects and complications of HBOT were recorded. Changes in best-corrected VA between the pre-COVID-19 group and the COVID-19-pandemic group were compared. Results: 34 men and 26 women with CRAO aged 27 to 89 years were included for analysis. The mean follow-up period was 169±226 days. The mean number of HBOT sessions received was 8.6±3.2. The mean best-corrected VA improved from 2.02±0.36 to 1.53±0.61 logMAR after HBOT (p<0.00001). 65% of patients had improvement and 33.3% had no improvement. VA changes between the pre-COVID-19 group (n=22) and COVID-19-pandemic group (n=38) were comparable (-0.53±0.58 vs -0.46±0.57 logMAR, p=0.59), despite a delay in hospital attendance. 41.7% of patients failed to equalize the pressure during treatment requiring myringotomy or even grommet insertion. 20% of patients had barotrauma. Other adverse events included convulsion, confusion, sinus pain, and hypoglycemia.
Conclusion:In patients with CRAO, HBOT may be effective in improving best-corrected VA, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.