Background: Although new pacemakers can register cardiac rhythm, few studies were performed evaluating their accuracy in diagnosing ventricular arrhythmias (VA). This study aimed to assess the correlation and agreement between the pacemaker's monitor and the ambulatory Holter in detecting VA.
Methods and results:We studied 129 patients with pacemakers, mean age 68.6 ± 19.1 years, 54.8% female. Once Holter monitoring was connected, the pacemakers' event counters were reset and clocks of both systems were synchronized to register electrocardiograms (ECG) simultaneously. Pacemakers were programmed to detect the lowest ventricular rate and lowest number of sequential beats allowed in their event monitors. After 72 hours, Holter and pacemakers records were analyzed. VA was defined in Holter and event monitor, respectively, as: isolated premature ventricular complexes: "PVC"; pairs: "couplets"; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT):"triplets"-3 beats; "runs"-4-8 or > 8 beats, and high ventricular rates ("HVR")-3-4 beats. Spearman correlations evaluated whether pacemaker and Holter identified the same parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the concordance between methods. The agreement between both systems was low, except for "triplet" and three beats NSVT (ICC = 0.984). The correlation for more than 10 PVC/h was moderate (Kappa = 0.483). When the pacemaker was programmed to detect HVR sequences of three beats lower than 140 bpm (< 140/3), the correlation with NSVT was perfect (r = 1) and agreement was also quite high (ICC = 0.800).
Conclusions:Pacemakers' event monitors underestimate the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias detected by Holter. Standardization of pacemakers' algorithms is required before using this function for patients' clinical follow-up.
Introduction
Indications for cardiac devices have been increasing as well as the need for
lead extractions as a result of infections, failed leads and device recalls.
Powered laser sheaths, with a global trend towards the in-creasingly
technological tools, meant to improve the procedure’s outcome but have
economic implications.
Objective
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the experience of a Bra-zilian center
that uses simple manual traction in most lead removals per-formed annually,
questioning the real need for expensive and technically challenging new
devices.
Methods
This retrospective observational study included 35 patients who had a
transvenous lead extraction in the period of a year between January 1998 and
October 2014 at Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, in
Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Data were collected through a records review. They
were evaluated based on age, type of device, dwelling time, indication for
removal, technique used and immediate outcomes.
Results
The median dwelling time of the devices was 46.22 months. Infec-tion, lead
fracture and device malfunction were the most common indica-tions. Simple
traction was the method of choice, used in 88.9% of the pro-cedures. Manual
traction presented high success rates, resulting in com-plete removal
without complications in 90% of the cases.
Conclusion
This article suggests that lead extraction by simple manual traction can
still be performed effectively in countries with economic diffi-culties as a
first attempt, leaving auxiliary tools for a second attempt in case of
failure or contraindications to the simple manual traction technique.
Long QT syndrome is one of the most feared entities in hospitalized patients due to the potential risk for ventricular tachycardia and sudden death. Association between channelopathies and congenital cardiomyopathy is a new entity that has been studied recently. We report an interesting case of this association that maybe related to a genetic mutation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.