Proton MRS (1H MRS) provides noninvasive, quantitative metabolite profiles of tissue and has been shown to aid the clinical management of several brain diseases. Although most modern clinical MR scanners support MRS capabilities, routine use is largely restricted to specialized centers with good access to MR research support. Widespread adoption has been slow for several reasons, and technical challenges toward obtaining reliable good‐quality results have been identified as a contributing factor. Considerable progress has been made by the research community to address many of these challenges, and in this paper a consensus is presented on deficiencies in widely available MRS methodology and validated improvements that are currently in routine use at several clinical research institutions. In particular, the localization error for the PRESS localization sequence was found to be unacceptably high at 3 T, and use of the semi‐adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence is a recommended solution. Incorporation of simulated metabolite basis sets into analysis routines is recommended for reliably capturing the full spectral detail available from short TE acquisitions. In addition, the importance of achieving a highly homogenous static magnetic field (B0) in the acquisition region is emphasized, and the limitations of current methods and hardware are discussed. Most recommendations require only software improvements, greatly enhancing the capabilities of clinical MRS on existing hardware. Implementation of these recommendations should strengthen current clinical applications and advance progress toward developing and validating new MRS biomarkers for clinical use.

A large body of published work shows that proton (hydrogen 1 [ 1 H]) magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy has evolved from a research tool into a clinical neuroimaging modality. Herein, the authors present a summary of brain disorders in which MR spectroscopy has an impact on patient management, together with a critical consideration of common data acquisition and processing procedures. The article documents the impact of 1 H MR spectroscopy in the clinical evaluation of disorders of the central nervous system. The clinical usefulness of 1 H MR spectroscopy has been established for brain neoplasms, neonatal and pediatric disorders (hypoxia-ischemia, inherited metabolic diseases, and traumatic brain injury), demyelinating disorders, and infectious brain lesions. The growing list of disorders for which 1 H MR spectroscopy may contribute to patient management extends to neurodegenerative diseases, epilepsy, and stroke. To facilitate expanded clinical acceptance and standardization of MR spectroscopy methodology, guidelines are provided for data acquisition and analysis, quality assessment, and interpretation. Finally, the authors offer recommendations to expedite the use of robust MR spectroscopy methodology in the clinical setting, including incorporation of technical advances on clinical units.q RSNA, 2014 Online supplemental material is available for this article. G.O. (e-mail: gulin@cmrr.umn.edu). 2 The complete list of authors and affiliations is at the end of this article.q RSNA, 2014 Note: This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. Radiology H MR Spectrum of the Brain: Metabolites and Their Biomarker PotentialMR spectroscopy provides a very different basic "readout" than MR imaging, namely a spectrum rather than an techniques were developed. These early localization techniques included pointresolved spectroscopy (PRESS) (1,2) and stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) (3), methods that are now widely used in clinical MR spectroscopy applications.Preliminary studies revealed large differences in metabolite levels in acute stroke (4), chronic multiple sclerosis (5), and brain tumors compared with healthy brain (6). Although this work stimulated a surge of interest in 1 H MR spectroscopy for diagnosing and assessing CNS disorders during the early days of the "Decade of the Brain" (1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999), many suboptimal patient studies (7) and the lack of consistent guidelines have led to a situation where, 20 years later, MR spectroscopy is still considered an "investigational technique" by some medical professionals and health care organizations. However, the ability to make an early, noninvasive diagnosis or to increase confidence in a suspected diagnosis is highly valued by patients and clinicians alike. As a result, an increasing number of imaging centers are incorporating MR spectroscopy into their clinical protocols for brain...

Longitudinal and transverse relaxation times were measured for proton MRS signals from human brain metabolites at 3 T using a short-echo STEAM protocol and a surface coil as a transmitter/receiver. Volumes of interest containing mostly grey or mostly white matter were selected in occipital lobes of healthy subjects and relaxation times for the following resonances were obtained: N-acetylaspartate at 2.01 ppm (T(1) and T(2)), glutamate at 2.35 ppm (T(1)), creatine at 3.03 and 3.92 ppm (T(1) and T(2)), choline-containing substances at 3.22 ppm (T(1) and T(2)), myo-inositol at 3.57 and 3.65 ppm (T(1)) and the overlapping signals of glutamate and glutamine at 3.75 ppm (T(1)). The T(1) relaxation times obtained range from 0.97 to 1.47 s for grey matter and from 0.87 to 1.35 s for white matter. On the other hand, T(2) relaxation times range from 116 to 247 ms and from 141 to 295 ms in grey and white matter, respectively. Generally, the T(1) values measured at 3 T are close to the previously published data found at 1.5, 2 and 4.1 T. Also, the T(2) values confirm the previously observed decrease in transverse relaxation times with increasing static magnetic field. The proton relaxation times obtained will allow improved sequence design and spectra quantitation at 3 T, currently tested for enhanced clinical applications.

Optimum ADC determination and DW imaging quality at 3.0 T was found with a combined b value protocol of 50 and 850 sec/mm(2). This provided a high accuracy for differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors.

DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.