Purpose The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire is one of the frequently used outcome scores in pediatric studies. However, a recent study demonstrated that the pediatric population had a limited understanding of some of its questions. Therefore, the KOOS‐Child questionnaire was developed specifically for this population. Our team produced a French adaptation based on the English version. The objective of the current study was to validate the French adaptation of the KOOS‐Child questionnaire. Methods After ethic board approval, the questionnaire was translated from English to French by two French speaking orthopedic surgeons. Following consensus, the translated version was retranslated to English by a professional translator. A group of experts compared the original and back translated version and decided on a final adapted questionnaire version. Ninety‐nine 8–16 year‐old patients were prospectively recruited from our pediatric orthopedic surgery clinic. Twenty‐one control participants and 78 patients suffering from knee pain were recruited. The participants were asked to answer the translated French version of the KOOS‐Child questionnaire and two validated French pediatric quality of life surveys. Results Statistical analysis demonstrated no statistically significant demographic difference between the control population and the patients suffering from a knee pathology. The mean for the five different domains of the KOOS‐Child questionnaire showed statistical differences (p < 0.001) between the two groups. Construct validity was demonstrated through testing of previously validated hypothesis of correlation. Internal consistency was also confirmed in injured patients. Conclusions In conclusion, the current study results demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency, good construct validity and inconclusive discriminant capacity of the French adaptation of the KOOS‐Child questionnaire. Level of evidence II.
Syndesmosis injuries need to be accurately diagnosed and managed to avoid chronic pain, early arthritis, and instability. To this end, the present study aimed to analyze the epidemiology of syndesmotic injuries in a pediatric ankle fracture cohort and identify patient and surgery-related characteristics. A retrospective review of all the ankle fractures during a 12-year period at a single pediatric referral center was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: a fractured ankle that underwent a surgical fixation, at least 1 radiograph available for review before fixation, available information regarding surgery, including operative report and fluoroscopic images, and younger than 18 years at the time of surgery. Demographic information, trauma, radiographs, surgical details, clinical examination, follow up, outcomes, and physeal status (skeletally immature, transitional, or mature) were recorded. Finally, patients were divided in 2 groups: with or without syndesmotic fixation. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney test for nonparametric data to compare continuous parameters, and χ 2 test for categorical parameters. A total of 128 patients were included with a mean age of 14.1 years. There were 80 boys and 48 girls. There were 51 skeletally immature patients, 23 with transitional fractures, and 54 that were skeletally mature. The main finding of this study is that only 11 patients from the mature group underwent syndesmotic fixation. There were no cases of syndesmotic fixation in the skeletally immature and transitional groups. This is the first retrospective study to focus specifically on syndesmotic injuries in a pediatric population who underwent ankle fracture fixation. Only 11 skeletally mature patients underwent syndesmotic fixation out of 128 patients in this cohort. This result raises the question of whether there are accurate diagnostic tools to evaluate syndesmosis in children.
Background: Syndesmotic injuries can lead to long-term complications; hence, they require careful management. Conservative treatment is adequate when 1 syndesmotic ligament is injured, but surgery is often necessary to achieve articular congruity when 3 syndesmotic ligaments are ruptured. However, there is some controversy over the best treatment for 2-ligament injuries. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a controlled ankle motion (CAM) walking boot on syndesmotic instability following iatrogenic isolated anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) injury and combined AiTFL/interosseous ligament (IOL) injuries in a cadaveric simulated weightbearing model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected to expose the tibial plateau and syndesmosis. The specimens were fitted to a custom-made device, and a reproducible axial load of 750 N was applied. Iatrogenic rupture of the syndesmotic ligaments (AiTFL + IOL) was done sequentially. Uninjured syndesmoses, isolated AiTFL rupture, and combined AiTFL/IOL rupture were compared with and without axial loading (AL) and CAM boot. The distal tibiofibular relationship was evaluated using a previously validated computed tomography scan measurement system. Wilcoxon tests for paired samples and nonparametric data were used. Results: The only difference noted in the distal tibiofibular relationship during AL was an increase in the external rotation of the fibula when using the CAM boot. This was observed with AiTFL rupture (8.40° vs 11.17°; P = .009) and combined AiTFL/IOL rupture (8.81° vs 11.97°; P = .005). Conclusion: AL did not cause a significant displacement between the tibia and fibula, even when 2 ligaments were ruptured. However, the CAM boot produced a significant external rotation with 1 or 2 injured ligaments. Clinical Relevance: Further studies are needed to assess the capacity of the CAM walking boot to prevent malreduction when external rotation forces are applied to the ankle. Moreover, special care should be taken during the fitting of the CAM boot to avoid overinflation of the cushions.
The mechanical properties of sutures are important for wound closure and meniscus repair. A tough gel coating technology has been developed to modify and functionalize sutures, but its effects on suture degradation remain unexplored. Our aim is to investigate how a tough gel coating mediates the properties of the suture. The Polyglactin910 (Vicryl) suture was chosen because it is widely used, strong, easy to handle, and degradable. This study compared six pristine Vicryl sutures and six coated Vicryl sutures at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. All the sutures were soaked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), to mimic degradation in physiological conditions, and tensile strength was tested at each time point.The pH of the soaking mediums was measured weekly and compared at 4, 5, and 6 weeks. No significant difference (p = 0.059 and p = 0.576) was found between the absolute and normalized breaking force of coated and pristine Vicryl sutures at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. After 4 weeks of immersion, the soaking medium became more acidic for both suture types. The decrease in pH was less significant for coated Vicryl sutures than for pristine ones (p < 0.001) at 4, 5, and 6 weeks of immersion. Although coating does not affect the strength of Vicryl sutures soaked in PBS, it can effectively act as a buffer to the acidic environment caused by suture degradation, which could help reduce inflammation.Hydrogel coating is a promising technology to modify suture characteristics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.