No abstract

Background Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is often diagnosed in critically ill patients. Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement facilitates less invasive gallbladder decompression in patients who are poor surgical candidates. Specific guidelines for optimal management of AAC patients following PCT placement remain to be defined. We hypothesize that AAC patients are at lower risk of recurrent cholecystitis than acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) patients and do not require cholecystectomy after PCT placement. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent PCT placement for AAC or ACC between 6/1/2007 and 5/31/2019 was performed. Primary outcome was recurrent cholecystitis and interval cholecystectomy for patients surviving 30 days after PCT placement. Secondary outcome was 30 day mortality. A cox regression model calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for the outcomes. Results Eighty-four AAC and 85 ACC patients underwent PCT placement. Compared to ACC patients, more AAC patients were male (72.6 vs. 48.2%; p \ 0.01), younger (median age 62 vs. 73 years; p \ 0.01), and required intensive care (69.0 vs. 52.9%; p = 0.04), with lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.0 vs. 6.0; p \ 0.01). 30 day mortality was higher among AAC patients than ACC patients (45.2 vs. 21.2%; p \ 0.01). 2/24 (8.3%) AAC patients and 5/31 (16.1%) ACC patients developed recurrent cholecystitis at a median 208.0 days (IQR:64.0-417.0) after PCT placement and 115.0 days (IQR:7.0-403.0) following PCT removal. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that AAC patients had lower likelihood of interval cholecystectomy compared to ACC patients (AHR 2.35; 95% CI:1.11,4.96). Conclusion Recurrent cholecystitis is rare in patients surviving 30 days following PCT placement. When compared with ACC patients, fewer AAC patients require cholecystectomy.

Background Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common pediatric renal malignancy and bilateral disease (BWT) occurs in 5% of cases and is associated with poor outcomes. Management of BWT includes chemotherapy and oncologic resection while preserving renal function. Previous literature has demonstrated variable approaches in BWT treatment. The aim of this study was to examine a single institution experience and outcomes with BWT. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with WT treated at a free-standing tertiary children’s hospital between 1998 and 2018. Patients with BWT were identified and treatment courses were compared. Outcomes of interest included need for dialysis post-operatively, need for renal transplantation post-operatively, disease recurrence, and overall survival. Results Of 120 children with WT, 9 children (6F:3M) of median age 32 months (IQR: 24-50 months) and median weight 13.7 kg (IQR: 10.9-16.2 kg) were diagnosed with and treated for BWT. Pre-operative biopsies were obtained in 4/9 patients, 3 of whom received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 1 who underwent radical nephrectomy. Of the 5 patients who did not undergo biopsy, 4/5 were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 1/5 underwent upfront nephrectomy. Post-operatively, 4/9 children required dialysis, of whom 2 subsequently underwent renal transplantation. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and of the remaining 7 patients, disease recurrence occurred in 5/7 children and overall survival was 71% (n=5). Conclusion Management of BWT varies regarding the use of pre-operative biopsy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and extent of disease resection. Further guidelines on treatment protocols may optimize outcomes in children with BWT.

No abstract