Identifying vital nodes in networks exhibiting a community structure is a fundamental issue. Indeed, community structure is one of the main properties of real-world networks. Recent works have shown that community-aware centrality measures compare favorably with classical measures agnostic about this ubiquitous property. Nonetheless, there is no clear consensus about how they relate and in which situation it is better to use a classical or a community-aware centrality measure. To this end, in this paper, we perform an extensive investigation to get a better understanding of the relationship between classical and community-aware centrality measures reported in the literature. Experiments use artificial networks with controlled community structure properties and a large sample of real-world networks originating from various domains. Results indicate that the stronger the community structure, the more appropriate the community-aware centrality measures. Furthermore, variations of the degree and community size distribution parameters do not affect the results. Finally, network transitivity and community structure strength are the most significant drivers controlling the interactions between classical and community-aware centrality measures.

Hierarchy and centrality are two popular notions used to characterize the importance of entities in complex systems. Indeed, many complex systems exhibit a natural hierarchical structure, and centrality is a fundamental characteristic allowing to identify key constituents. Several measures based on various aspects of network topology have been proposed in order to quantify these concepts. While numerous studies have investigated whether centrality measures convey redundant information, how centrality and hierarchy measures are related is still an open issue. In this paper, we investigate the association between centrality and hierarchy using several correlation and similarity evaluation measures. A series of experiments is performed in order to evaluate the combinations of 6 centrality measures with 4 hierarchy measures across 28 diverse real-world networks with varying topological characteristics. Results show that network density and transitivity play a key role in shaping the redundancy between centrality and hierarchy measures.

No abstract

No abstract

It is of paramount importance to uncover influential nodes to control diffusion phenomena in a network. In recent works, there is a growing trend to investigate the role of the community structure to solve this issue. Up to now, the vast majority of the so-called community-aware centrality measures rely on non-overlapping community structure. However, in many real-world networks, such as social networks, the communities overlap. In other words, a node can belong to multiple communities. To overcome this drawback, we propose and investigate the "Overlapping Modularity Vitality" centrality measure. This extension of "Modularity Vitality" quantifies the community structure strength variation when removing a node. It allows identifying a node as a hub or a bridge based on its contribution to the overlapping modularity of a network. A comparative analysis with its non-overlapping version using the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic diffusion model has been performed on a set of six real-world networks. Overall, Overlapping Modularity Vitality outperforms its alternative. These results illustrate the importance of incorporating knowledge about the overlapping community structure to identify influential nodes effectively. Moreover, one can use multiple ranking strategies as the two measures are signed. Results show that selecting the nodes with the top positive or the top absolute centrality values is more effective than choosing the ones with the maximum negative values to spread the epidemic.