Aims Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) harnesses a patient’s immune system to target cancer. There are sparse existing data characterizing death outcomes after CAR-T-related cardiotoxicity. This study examines the association between CAR-T-related severe cardiovascular events (SCE) and mortality. Methods and results From a multi-centre registry of 202 patients receiving anti-CD19 CAR-T, covariates including standard baseline cardiovascular and cancer parameters and biomarkers were collected. Severe cardiovascular events were defined as a composite of heart failure, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction. Thirty-three patients experienced SCE, and 108 patients died during a median follow-up of 297 (interquartile range 104–647) days. Those that did and did not die after CAR-T were similar in age, sex, and prior anthracycline use. Those who died had higher peak interleukin (IL)-6 and ferritin levels after CAR-T infusion, and those who experienced SCE had higher peak IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and troponin levels. The day-100 and 1-year Kaplan–Meier overall mortality estimates were 18% and 43%, respectively, while the non-relapse mortality (NRM) cumulative incidence rates were 3.5% and 6.7%, respectively. In a Cox model, SCE occurrence following CAR-T was independently associated with increased overall mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6–4.7] after adjusting for age, cancer type and burden, anthracycline use, cytokine release syndrome grade ≥ 2, pre-existing heart failure, hypertension, and African American ancestry; SCEs were independently associated with increased NRM (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4–8.8) after adjusting for cancer burden. Conclusion Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients who experience SCE have higher overall mortality and NRM and higher peak levels of IL-6, CRP, ferritin, and troponin.
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy harnesses a patient’s own immune system to target cancer. Cardiotoxicity occurs in up to 25% of patients treated with CAR-T. There are limited data characterizing the association between the development of cardiotoxicity after CAR-T and mortality among patients following CAR T cell therapy. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that cardiotoxicity following CAR-T treatment would be associated with a higher rate of mortality. Cardiotoxicity was a composite outcome defined as the development of heart failure, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction. Methods: We included the first 202 adult patients entered into a multicenter registry receiving anti-CD 19 CAR-T for lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Of these, 108 died and 94 survived. Covariates included standard baseline cardiovascular and cancer parameters, the occurrence of cardiotoxicity and mortality. Results: Those that did and did not die after CAR-T were similar in age, sex, and pre-lymphodepletion chemotherapy regiment. Death after CAR-T was more common in patients with than without hypertension (66% vs. 47%, p=0.009) or ALL (66% vs. 48%, p=0.02), and less common with baseline coronary artery disease (25 vs. 56%, p=0.04). There was no difference in mean cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade, rate of ≥2 CRS, or in the use of tocilizumab or steroids between those who did and did not die after CAR-T. During a mean follow-up of 372±284 days, 33 (16%) patients experienced cardiotoxicity. Patients with vs. without cardiotoxicity died more often (76% vs. 49%, OR 3.2, CI 1.4 - 7.6, p=0.005). In a Cox model adjusted for covariates identified in univariate analyses, occurrence of cardiotoxicity with CAR-T was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.17-2.92, p=0.009). Conclusions: CAR-T recipients who experience cardiotoxicity have higher mortality.
Introduction: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and associated cardiovascular (CV) events are common following infusion of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T). There are no data characterizing whether CAR-T recipients with a pre-existing cardiac dysfunction (LVEF <53%) are at increased risk for CV events following CAR-T. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that cardiac dysfunction would be associated with a higher rate of CV events following CAR-T infusion. CV events were defined as a composite of cardiogenic shock, clinical heart failure, myocardial infarction, or arrhythmia. Methods: Patients in a multi-center registry of adult CAR-T recipients with a known baseline LVEF were included (n=241). Covariates included standard baseline CV and cancer parameters. Results: In total, 22 (9%) CAR-T patients had a pre-existing cardiac dysfunction. Those with and without [219 (91%)] baseline cardiac dysfunction were similar in age, gender, pre-existing CV risk factors, and ECOG performance status. LVEF among patients with cardiac dysfunction ranged from 25%-52%. There was no difference in prior anthracycline use, cancer type or burden, but cardiac dysfunction patients had higher rates of prior radiation (36% vs 16%, p=0.02). Cardiac dysfunction patients received less investigational CAR-T (9% vs 31%, p=0.03), more tisagenlecleucel (36% vs 18%, p=0.04), and had similar rates of axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel. There was no difference in mean CRS grade, rate of ≥2 grade CRS, or in tocilizumab or steroids use between those with and without cardiac dysfunction. During a median follow-up of 294 (IQR 123-661) days, 60 (25%) patients experienced CV events with more events in patients with cardiac dysfunction (63% vs 21%, p<0.001). In a Cox model adjusted for covariates identified in univariate analyses, baseline cardiac dysfunction was independently associated with an increased CV events risk (adjusted HR: 4.9, 95% CI 2.54–9.61, p<0.001) Conclusions: CAR-T recipients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction experience more CV events despite similar rates of CRS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.