The existence of structure in sport competition is implicated in the widespread practice of using the information gathered from a past contest to prepare for a future contest. Based on this reasoning, we previously analysed squash match-play for evidence of signature traits from among the stochastic relations between the various types of shot. The mixed findings from these analyses led us to re-analyse squash match-play as a dynamical system. Here, we extend this line of investigation with some suggestions as to how various sports might be described further within this theoretical framework. We offer some examples of dynamical interactions in dyadic (i.e. one vs one) and team (e.g. many vs many) sports, as well as some predictions from a dynamical systems analysis for these types of sports contests. This paper should serve to initiate further research into the complex interactions that occur in sport competition.

Subjects performed two patterns of coordination between the elbow and wrist joints of the right arm: 1) wrist flexion synchronized with elbow flexion and wrist extension with elbow extension (homologous muscle groups); and 2) wrist extension synchronized with elbow flexion and wrist flexion with elbow extension (nonhomologous muscle groups). As a parameter, cycling frequency, was increased, an abrupt switch in the phase relation between the elbow and wrist joints occurred. Similar effects were observed in underlying neuromuscular (EMG) timing patterns. Observed transitions depended on whether the forearm was prone or supine, not simply on the muscle pairing across the joints. With the forearm supine, transitions were from pattern (2) to pattern (1) above, and with the forearm prone the transitions were from pattern (1) to pattern (2). When subjects were initially prepared in pattern (1) with the forearm supine or in pattern (2) with the forearm prone, switching did not occur. En route to transitions, enhanced fluctuations in the phase relation occurred, indicating that loss of stability is at the origin of pattern change. Accompanying such changes in coordination were characteristic effects on end effector trajectories and velocity profiles. Possible neurophysiological mechanisms for context dependence in multijoint coordination are discussed.

An experiment is reported which investigated the visual control of discrete rapid arm movements. Subjects were required to move as rapidly as possible to several target width-movement distance combinations under both visual and non-visual conditions. The movement time (MT) data were supportive of Fitts' Law in that MT was linearly related and highly correlated to the Index of Difficulty (ID). MT was also similar for different target width-distance combinations sharing the same ID value. The error rate analysis, which compared visual to non-visual Performance, indicated that vision was only used, and to varying degrees, when MT exceeded 200 ms (3.58 ID level). There was some evidence that vision was differentially used within target width-distance combinations sharing the same ID. Estimates of endpoint variability generally reflected the results of the error rate analysis. These results do not support the discrete correction model of Fitts' Law proposed by Keele (1968).

Recent studies by Jones (1974) have posited that accurate movements in short-term motor memory (STMM) are mediated by the subject's ability to preset effector mechanisms and monitor their efferent output. Three experiments were conducted to examine this hypothesis. Experiment 1 involved comparisons between the reproduction of the end-location and the reproduction of the distance of a preselected movement. The results revealed that preselected location was superior to preselected distance, indicating that the efference attached to movement extent was not primary. Experiment 2 examined whether location cues were primarily encoded independent of the movement presentation mode. The subjects recalled target locations under preselected, constrained, and passive movement conditions. Recall in the preselected condition was superior to that in the constrained and passive conditions, which showed no difference, suggesting that afferent location information per se was not totally responsible for recall accuracy. Experiment 3 examined the processing requirements of preselected, constrained, and passive location information by filling the retention interval with interpolated processing activity. While preselected location was clearly superior, the three conditions were not differentially affected by processing activity. These overall findings were interpreted as contrary to Jones (1974) and pointed to the importance of preselection in short-term motor memory.Recent studies in motor behavior have emphasized the role of peripheral feedback in acquisition and retention processes (Adams, 1971;Stelmach, 1974). Such studies have led to theories in which control is viewed in terms of a comparison process between the feedback of the movement and a stored representation of prior sensory consequences (e.g., Adams, 1971). As such, the central aspects of human motor control have received little attention in spite of the overtures of Lashley (1951) and the known existence of central determinants of behavior in lower phyla (Wilson, 1961).

No abstract