The ICBN and its main branch (the posterior axillary nerve) were constant in all dissections. But its origin, size, connection to the brachial plexus and medial cutaneous nerve of the arm were variable, as was its ultimate destination in the arm.

The predictive model can be used in practice for individual prognosis after intervention, based on preoperative Wexner scores. The effect of anterior sphincteroplasty on fecal incontinence does not seem to deteriorate over time. A consensus Wexner cutoff is necessary to compare data and interventions.

No abstract

Background: In public hospitals, the work-up and surgery for patients with appendicitis is predominantly performed by surgical registrars, whereas in private hospitals, it is performed by consultants. This study aims to demonstrate the difference, if any, in the demographics, work-up, management and complication rate of patients in these two groups. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy at a major public hospital and major private hospital over the same 13 months. Data included demographics, admission details, work-up, length of stay, time to surgery, histology and complications. Fisher's exact test and the unpaired t-test were performed to look at the statistical difference between these two groups. Results: Total laparoscopic appendicectomies were 164 (public) and 105 (private). Median waiting times to operation were 13 and 9.5 h, respectively. Histological findings of appendicitis/neoplasia/normal appendix were 83.5/3.0/13.4% and 81.9/1.9/ 16.2%. Histological findings of gangrene or perforation were 26.2% and 11.6% (P = 0.0081). The proportion of those who had surgery more than 24 h after admission was 12.2% and 4.8% (P = 0.0517). Rates of pelvic collection were 1.2% and 1.9% (P = 0.6448), wound infection rates were 2.4% and 1.9% (P = 1) and overall complication rates were 7.3% and 8.6% (P = 0.8165). Mean operative time was 49.79 min for consultants and 67.98 min for registrars (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Consultants are faster at laparoscopic appendicectomies than registrars. A consultant lead service in a private hospital has earlier operation times and less patients ending up with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis but does not alter complication rates.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic ablation of large rectal adenomas is being increasingly used as primary treatment. Despite the avoidance of general anaesthesia and the prevention of more major procedures, patients undergoing endoscopic ablation have the disadvantage of multiple treatment sessions and the lack of adequate tissue sample for complete histological study. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of all patients with large rectal polyps treated with endoscopic ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 29 patients who underwent endoscopic ablation of large rectal adenoma were identified. All their case notes were analysed and information was collected on recurrence, treatment episodes, complications, the incidence of carcinoma and the necessity for further procedures. RESULTS: At a median 40 (range 4-67) months follow-up, 41% of patients had recurrence of their adenoma and 14% had been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Only 24% of patients had been discharged while 21% were clear but were still under surveillance. Seven (24%) patients had complications, 6 stenosis and one severe bleeding. All stenosis occurred in patients who had more than 10 treatment sessions. In all, 31% of patients needed further endoanal or abdominal surgery and the median time to making this decision was 28 (range 4-66) months. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Laser and argon ablation of large rectal adenomas has proved very disappointing. It should be reserved for patients who are unfit to undergo general anaesthesia.