To compare the outcomes of standard pop-titrated transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) and slow-coagulation TSCPC in the treatment of glaucoma. Design: Retrospective case series Subjects: This study included 78 eyes with glaucoma of any type or stage that underwent TSCPC as part of their treatment course Methods: This study compared 52 eyes treated with slow coagulation TSCPC to 26 eyes treated with standard pop-titrated TSCPC. Patient demographics, treatment course, surgical techniques, settings and outcomes were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and post-surgical complications. Results: The initial LogMAR VA was 1.94 (0.73) [mean (SD)] in the slow coagulation TSCPC group and 1.71 (0.90) in the standard TSCPC group (p=0.507). Initial IOP was 37 (13) mm Hg in the slow coagulation group and 39 (13) mm Hg in the standard group (p=0.297). The follow-up periods were 16.36 months and 24.68 months for the slow coagulation and standard groups (p=0.124). VA remained better than light-perception in 71.1% of slow coagulation treated patients and 65.0% of standard TSCPC treated patients (p=0.599). IOP remained below 20 mm Hg in 46% of slow coagulation treated patients and 44% of standard TSCPC treated patients (p=0.870). The mean number of complications was higher in the standard group [1.46 (1.24)] versus the slow coagulation group [0.62 (0.75)] (p=0.002). The incidence of the need for a second procedure (slow coagulation-28.8%, standard-23.1%, p=0.588) and maximum number of medications needed to control IOP postoperatively (p=0.771) were similar between the two groups.
For the first time these analyses describe a structure-function relationship between the retinal changes that occur in LHON patients as their disease progresses and vision worsens. The structural changes in the GCL, IPL, and RNFL preceded structural changes in the other retinal layers. This analysis suggests that the first 6 months after diagnosis define a target for therapeutic intervention, and this can inform treatment guidelines for ongoing therapeutic trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.