One of the benefits of Digital PCR (dPCR) is the potential for unparalleled precision enabling smaller fold change measurements. An example of an assessment that could benefit from such improved precision is the measurement of tumour-associated copy number variation (CNV) in the cell free DNA (cfDNA) fraction of patient blood plasma. To investigate the potential precision of dPCR and compare it with the established technique of quantitative PCR (qPCR), we used breast cancer cell lines to investigate HER2 gene amplification and modelled a range of different CNVs. We showed that, with equal experimental replication, dPCR could measure a smaller CNV than qPCR. As dPCR precision is directly dependent upon both the number of replicate measurements and the template concentration, we also developed a method to assist the design of dPCR experiments for measuring CNV. Using an existing model (based on Poisson and binomial distributions) to derive an expression for the variance inherent in dPCR, we produced a power calculation to define the experimental size required to reliably detect a given fold change at a given template concentration. This work will facilitate any future translation of dPCR to key diagnostic applications, such as cancer diagnostics and analysis of cfDNA.

The international standardizing organizations - International, ISO, and IUPAC - cooperated to produce the International Harmonized Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of (Chemical) Analytical Laboratories. The Working Group that produced the protocol agreed to revise that Protocol in the light of recent developments and the experience gained since it was first published. This revision has been prepared and agreed upon in the light of comments received following open consultation.

No abstract

Standard additions is a calibration technique devised to eliminate rotational matrix effects in analytical measurement. Although the technique is presented in almost every textbook of analytical chemistry, its behaviour in practice is not well documented and is prone to attract misleading accounts. The most important limitation is that the method cannot deal with translational matrix effects, which need to be handled separately. In addition, because the method involves extrapolation from known data, the method is often regarded as less precise than external calibration (interpolation) techniques. Here, using a generalised model of an analytical system, we look at the behaviour of the method of standard additions under a range of conditions, and find that, if executed optimally, there is no noteworthy loss of precision.

No abstract