Objective: To examine opioid prescribing patterns and consumption among patients undergoing common otologic surgeries. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study with chart review and telephone survey. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center. Methods: Retrospective chart review and telephone survey of those undergoing tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, stapedectomy, and cochlear implantation in 2018. The survey consisted of questions regarding the details of the number of pills taken, duration of opioid use, subjective pain control, the use of over-the-counter pain medications, opioid disposal, and their history of substance abuse. Results: Sixty-one patients were able to be contacted and agreed to participate in the study. Fifty-nine (96.7%) stated that their pain was controlled, and 10 (16.4%) did not take any opioids postoperatively despite their prescription. The mean morphine milligram equivalent (MME) prescribed was 99.9 (44.3) and MME taken was 45.2 (SD 46.3) (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean number of pills prescribed was 17.8 (SD 8.6) and mean taken was 7.9 (SD 8.3) (p < 0.001). Comparison between males and females regarding MME and pills prescribed and taken were not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05). Analysis of the MME and pills prescribed and taken among the different surgeries (tympanoplasty, stapes surgery, tympanomastoidectomy, and cochlear implantation) revealed no statistically significant interactions (p > 0.05). Pain control was achieved for 50% of patients with 5 pills (MME = 25 mg), for 75% with 12 pills (MME = 60 mg), and for 90% with 24 pills (MME = 135 mg). Conclusion: The opioid epidemic continues to be an ongoing issue in the United States, and prescription opioid abuse is a large contributor. There is increasing literature to suggest a practice of overprescribing in multiple surgical specialties. This same finding appears to be present in common otologic surgeries, where on average patients took less than half of the prescribed MME/pills, and 75% of patients had their pain controlled with 12 pills or fewer. Otolaryngologists performing otologic surgery should strongly consider adjusting their postoperative regimens to reflect these findings. Level of Evidence: 2b

Objective To assess the prevalence of distress and burnout in otolaryngology trainees, including associations with relevant sociodemographic and professional factors, and to compare these results with those of attending otolaryngologists. Study Design A cross-sectional survey of trainees and attending physicians. Setting Twelve academic otolaryngology programs. Methods Distress and burnout were measured with the Expanded Physician Well-being Index and the 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory. The Patient Health Questionnaire–2 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 were used to screen for depressive disorders and anxiety disorders, respectively. Associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics were assessed. Results Of the 613 surveys administered to trainees and attending physicians, 340 were completed (56%). Among 154 trainees, distress was present in 49%, professional burnout in 35%, positive depressive disorder screening in 5%, and positive anxiety disorder screening in 16%. In univariable analysis, female gender, hours worked in a typical week (HW), and nights on call in a typical week (NOC) were significantly associated with distress. In multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio, 3.91; P = .001) and HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.89; P = .003) remained significantly associated with distress. Female gender, HW, and NOC were significantly associated with burnout univariably, although only HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.92; P = .003) remained significantly associated with burnout in a multivariable setting. Attending physicians had less distress than trainees ( P = .02) and felt less callous and less emotionally hardened than trainees ( P < .001). Conclusion Otolaryngology trainees experience significant work-place distress (49%) and burnout (35%). Gender, HW, and NOC had the strongest associations with distress and burnout.

Objectives Despite increased concern with the opioid epidemic, literature remains scant regarding narcotic prescription and use following tonsillectomy. Study Design Retrospective cohort study with telephone interview. Subject and Methods A chart review from January to August 2018 evaluated the difference between prescribed amounts of narcotic and patient-reported usage following tonsillectomy ( Current Procedural Terminology codes 42821 and 42826). Patients were excluded if they used opioids for chronic pain, had a history of chronic opioid use or substance abuse, or underwent tonsillectomy to exclude malignancy. A telephone interview assessed opioid and nonopioid usage and pain control postoperatively, including amount and form of narcotics remaining. Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled at a mean 4.47 months after tonsillectomy. The mean ± SD prescribed morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 456.1 ± 281.7, with only 302.8 ± 206.2 consumed. The mean MME prescribed per day was 74.1 ± 44.8, and average days of narcotic usage postoperatively was 9.6 ± 4.6, correlating with a mean MME per day of 49.2 ± 34.3 if the maximum prescribed dose per day was consumed. Fifty-four (84.4%) patients reported pain as well controlled. Forty-three (67.2%) patients reported residual narcotic medication, with 228.1 ± 208.5 MMEs remaining per patient. Narcotic solutions were more completely consumed than tablet forms, with 23.1% and 44.0% remaining, respectively. Patients cited uncertainty about safe disposal and safeguarding for future use as reasons for keeping residual narcotic. Conclusions Patient-reported narcotic use is significantly lower than the amount prescribed after tonsillectomy for benign disease. Providers can use these data to adjust narcotic-prescribing patterns while maintaining appropriate pain management for patients undergoing tonsillectomy.