Objectives/Hypothesis The expiratory disproportion index (EDI) is the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by peak expiratory flow rate multiplied by 100. An elevated EDI (>50) can help differentiate upper airway stenosis from other dyspnea etiologies, but this has not been verified when considering body habitus. We hypothesize that the predictive value of elevated EDI in diagnosing airway stenosis will be lower in obese patients as compared to nonobese patients. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Methods Patients >18 years old with recorded pulmonary function test values, body mass index (BMI), and airway imaging were reviewed retrospectively from January 2011 to October 2018. EDI was recorded for four cohorts: nonobese and nonstenotic, obese and nonstenotic, nonobese and stenotic, and obese and stenotic, to determine the mean EDI and the sensitivity and specificity of an elevated EDI. Results Mean EDI values were 66.53 ± 17.66 and 49.55 ± 2.04 in the nonobese stenotic and nonstenotic groups, respectively (P < .01). They were 58.00 ± 10.79 and 45.02 ± 1.42 in the obese stenotic and nonstenotic groups, respectively (P < .01). At a threshold of >50, EDI had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 56.2% in differentiating between stenotic and nonstenotic cases in the nonobese cohort and 50.0% and 71.9% in the obese cohort. Conclusions As previously established, mean EDI values were significantly different in stenotic and nonstenotic patients in both BMI cohorts. However, at the established threshold of >50, EDI was not as sensitive at identifying stenotic cases in obese patients as in nonobese patients. This suggests that the EDI remains useful in obese patients when elevated but should not be relied upon to rule out stenosis. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:606–609, 2021

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) variation was measured in 18 healthy children (Group I) aged 9.25 to 13.3 years (mean, 11 years) and in 17 asymptomatic asthmatic children (Group II) aged 8.75 to 14.25 years (mean, 11.9 years) receiving no bronchodilators. PEF was measured four times a day for a period of 10-14 days. There were no differences between Group I and Group II regarding age, height, weight, sex, duration of the study, and overall mean PEF values. Mean daily PEF variation amplitude (difference between the highest and the lowest daily values as a percent of the mean) was significantly higher in Group II than in Group I subjects (15.2 vs. 9.9%), and so was cosinor amplitude (9.6 vs. 5.9%). Significant circadian rhythm in PEF was detected by cosinor analysis in nine subjects of Group I and in eight subjects of Group II. Mean PEF bathyphase calculated by cosinor analysis (trough time in a 24 h scale) was similar in the two groups (0503 h, in Group I and 0434 h in Group II). The results of this study show that the amplitude of circadian variation in PEF tends to be higher in asymptomatic asthmatic children than in normal children, but there is too much overlap to use PEF monitoring to identify an individual asymptomatic asthmatic child. Therefore, diurnal variation of PEF is not suitable for diagnosing mild asthmatics.

Objectives: The Airway Alert banner at our institution alerts physicians to patients with the potential for a difficult intubation. Difficult airway guidelines can reduce intubation complications in the operating room, but little research has been done in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesize that patients meeting criteria for the banner will have a more difficult intubation and increased complications.Methods: Patients greater than 18 years old who presented to the ED for any complaint and required intubation were reviewed from January 2015 to January 2020 and divided into those meeting criteria for a difficult airway ("criteria cohort") and those who did not ("non-criteria cohort"). Past medical history and details of the intubation were collected. Results:The mean number of attempts for intubation was 1.60 in the criteria cohort and 1.36 in the non-criteria cohort (P > .05). The mean grade of view was 1.73 and 1.39, respectively (P < .05). The average size of endotracheal tube was 7.50 and 7.74 in the criteria and non-criteria cohorts (P < .05). The use of adjuncts was 28.6% and 12.5%, respectively (P < .01). The average number of intubation attempts and complication rate did not differ significantly.Conclusions: Intubations in patients meeting criteria for the banner are associated with a more difficult view, use of smaller endotracheal tube, and increased use of adjuncts, but not with a significantly higher rate of complications or attempts. Physicians should prepare with additional endotracheal tube sizes, adjuncts, and a plan for secondary strategies in these patients.

No abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To identify the incidence and nature of positive findings on imaging studies ordered for evaluation of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) of unknown etiology, to analyze these findings based on laterality, and to examine the use of the expanded-field computed tomography (CT) neck protocol in this evaluation.Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: A total of 145 patients from 2000 to 2018 with UVFP of unknown etiology were studied. Data on imaging studies ordered, laterality of paralysis, and significant positive results were studied. An expanded-field CT neck protocol that included the entire course of the vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves was instituted during the study period.Results: A total of 20.7% of patients had an etiology for paralysis identified on imaging. Malignancies comprised the majority of findings overall (19/30), whether in the chest (12/18) or the neck (7/12). Etiology was more often found in the chest for left-sided paralysis (15/21) and in the neck for right-sided paralysis (6/9). In 26 patients who underwent both expanded-field CT neck and CT chest, no findings related to the UVFP were seen on CT chest that were not captured by expanded-field CT neck.Conclusions: This is one of the largest retrospective studies examining the incidence of positive findings on imaging studies for evaluation of UVFP of unknown etiology. Imaging in one of five patients with UVFP of unknown etiology will reveal a causative lesion, most often malignant. Left-sided paralysis tends to localize to the chest, and right-sided paralysis to the neck. Expanded-field CT neck may allow practitioners to forego dedicated CT chest in evaluation of UVFP.