Delayed puberty (DP) is defined as the lack of pubertal development by an age that is 2-2.5 SDs beyond the population mean. Although it generally represents a normal variant in pubertal timing, concern that DP could be the initial presentation of a serious underlying disorder has led to a diagnostic approach that is variable and may include tests that are unnecessary and costly. In this review, we examine available literature regarding the recommended diagnostic tests and aetiologies identified during the evaluation of youth with DP. We view this literature through the prism of the seemingly otherwise well adolescent. To provide further clinical context, we also evaluate the clinical and laboratory data from patients seen with DP in our centre over a 2-year period. The literature and our data reveal wide variability in the number of tests performed and raise the question of whether tests, other than gonadotropins, obtained in the absence of signs or symptoms of an underlying disorder are routinely warranted. Together this information provides a pragmatic rationale for revisiting recommendations calling for broad testing during the initial diagnostic evaluation of an otherwise healthy adolescent with DP. We highlight the need for further research comparing the utility of broader screening with a more streamlined approach, such as limiting initial testing to gonadotropins and a bone age, which, while not diagnostic, is often useful for height prediction, followed by close clinical monitoring. If future research supports a more streamlined approach to DP, then much unnecessary testing could be eliminated.

Recommendations are made in 2 broad categories: greater exposure and greater information. As medical students and IM residents progress through their training, their interest in rheumatology lessens, thus it is important to begin recruitment initiatives as early as possible in the training process.

Context In children with isolated growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD), routine biochemical screening for multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD) and adverse effects related to growth hormone (GH) treatment are frequently performed. More evidence is needed to support this practice. Objectives To evaluate the rate of development of MPHD among children initially diagnosed with isolated GHD and to assess the utility of screening tests to identify complications of GH therapy. Design Retrospective analysis of subjects treated with GH since 2005. For the first objective, only subjects diagnosed with GHD were included. Subjects were excluded if GHD was associated with an acquired disorder or condition known to be associated with pituitary abnormalities. For the second objective, other GH-treated diagnoses were included. Patients A total of 328 subjects (171 with GHD, 154 with idiopathic short stature, and three with SHOX deficiency). Results In subjects with isolated GHD, MPHD was diagnosed in seven (4.2%) after a mean of 35.4 months (range, 9.4 to 68.0). Sex, age at diagnosis, duration of GH, and peak stimulated GH levels were not associated with developing MPHD. Among subjects with an MRI abnormality, 13.9% developed MPHD (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 33.7). In the entire cohort, three subjects (0.9%) developed dysglycemia, and no subject had persistently abnormal liver or renal function tests. Conclusions There is a limited role for routine biochemical screening for MPHD in children with idiopathic isolated GHD or for adverse effects in otherwise healthy children. Routine biochemical screening for MPHD should be limited to those with an abnormal MRI.