Dynamic dental instruments generate abundant aerosols in the work environment. Dental unit waterlines (DUWL) support a large microbial population and can be a significant source of bioaerosols generated during dental treatments. This study was conducted to characterize bioaerosol generation during dental treatments performed in standardized conditions. Culture-based method (R2A, and blood agar with and without O2) and fluorescence microscopy were used. Dental cleaning procedures were performed in an isolated treatment room with controlled ventilation rate. Andersen microbial samplers were used to collect culturable bioaerosols generated before (baseline), during, and after 2 hr of dental treatments. Inhalable dust samplers were used to measure total bioaerosols content in dental hygienist's and patients' breathing zones. AGI-30 were used for the collection of the endotoxin. The use of fluorescence microscopy in combination with culture demonstrated that dental staff and patients were exposed to up to 1.86 E+05 bacteria/m(3) generated during treatments. Fortunately, bioaerosols returned to baseline within 2 hr after the dental procedures. The small diameter of the aerosols generated (< 1 microm) suggests that the risk of contact between the aerosolized bacteria and the respiratory system of exposed individuals is likely to occur.

Dental unit waterlines (DUWL) support growth of a dense microbial population that includes pathogens and hypersensitivity-inducing bacteria, such as Legionella spp. and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Dynamic dental instruments connected to DUWL generate aerosols in the work environment, which could allow waterborne pathogens to be aerosolized. The use of the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides a more accurate estimation of exposure levels compared with the traditional culture approach. Bioaerosol sampling was performed 13 times in an isolated dental treatment room according to a standardized protocol that included four dental prophylaxis treatments. Inhalable dust samples were taken at the breathing zone of both the hygienist and patient and outside the treatment room (control). Total bacteria as well as Legionella spp. and NTM were quantified by qPCR in bioaerosol and DUWL water samples. Dental staff and patients are exposed to bacteria generated during dental treatments (up to 4.3 E + 05 bacteria per m(3) of air). Because DUWL water studied was weakly contaminated by Legionella spp. and NTM, their aerosolization during dental treatment was not significant. As a result, infectious and sensitization risks associated with legionellae and NTM should be minimal.

Aims:  To confirm the presence of viable Legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and compare this method with culture approach and also to validate the utility of an enrichment to increase FISH sensitivity. Methods and Results:  Water samples from 40 dental units were analysed. Three different techniques for detecting Legionella spp. were compared: (i) culture approach, (ii) direct FISH and (iii) FISH with a previous R2A medium enrichment (R2A/FISH). The FISH detection was confirmed by PCR. The use of the direct FISH does not improve significantly the detection of legionellae when compared with the culture. On the contrary, when R2A/FISH was performed, sensitivity was, respectively, two‐ and threefold higher than that with the direct FISH and culture approach. Using R2A/FISH, 63% of water samples analysed showed a contamination by legionellae. Conclusions:  Legionellae detection by direct FISH and R2A/FISH in dental unit water is possible but is more rapid and more sensitive (R2A/FISH) than the culture approach. Significance and Impact of the Study:  R2A/FISH showed that several pathogens present in DUWL are viable but may not be culturable. Unlike PCR, R2A/FISH is designed to detect only metabolically active cells and therefore provides more pertinent information on infectious risk.