Background Male sex and old age are risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019, but the intersection of sex and aging on antibody responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines has not been characterized. Methods Plasma samples were collected from older adults (aged 75–98 years) before and after 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, and from younger adults (aged 18–74 years) post-dose 2, for comparison. Antibody binding to SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike protein [S], S receptor-binding domain, and nucleocapsid), functional activity against S, and live-virus neutralization were measured against the vaccine virus and the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants of concern (VOCs). Results Vaccination induced greater antibody titers in older females than in older males, with both age and frailty associated with reduced antibody responses in males but not females. Responses declined significantly in the 6 months after the second dose. The third dose restored functional antibody responses and eliminated disparities caused by sex, age, and frailty in older adults. Responses to the VOCs, particularly the Omicron variant, were significantly reduced relative to the vaccine virus, with older males having lower titers to the VOCs than older females. Older adults had lower responses to the vaccine and VOC viruses than younger adults, with greater disparities in males than in females. Conclusions Older and frail males may be more vulnerable to breakthrough infections owing to low antibody responses before receipt of a third vaccine dose. Promoting third dose coverage in older adults, especially males, is crucial to protecting this vulnerable population.

The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis or interpretation of data; decision to submit, preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript for publication.

The first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic was dominated by two SARS-CoV-2 lineages: A-lineages (Clade 19B) and B-lineages (Clade 19A). However, with the emergence of the Spike D614G substitution in B.1 lineages (Clade 20A), both early lineages were outcompeted and remained near-extinction from mid-2020 onwards. In early-2021, there was a re-emergence and persistence of novel A-lineage variants with substitutions in the Spike gene resembling those found in Variants of Concern (VOCs). An early A.3 variant (MD-HP00076/2020) and three A.2.5 variants (MD-HP02153/2021, MD-HP05922/2021 and CA-VRLC091/2021) were isolated and characterized for their genomic sequences, antibody neutralization, andin vitroreplication. All A.2.5 isolates had five Spike mutations relative to the A.3 variant sequence: D614G, L452R, Δ141-143, D215A, and ins215AGY. Plaque reduction neutralization assays demonstrated that A.2.5 isolates had a 2.5 to 5-fold reduction in neutralization using contemporaneous COVID-19 convalescent plasma when compared to A.3.In vitroviral characterization in VeroE6 cell lines revealed that the A.3 isolate grew faster and spread more than A.2.5. On VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells, significant syncytia formation was also observed with the A.2.5 isolates, however Spike cleavage efficiency did not explain these differences. In human nasal epithelial cell (hNEC) cultures, the A.2.5 isolates grew significantly faster and to higher total infectious virus titers than A.3. All A.2.5 lineage isolates grew significantly faster at 37°C than at 33°C irrespective of cell type, and to higher peak titers except compared to A.3. This suggests A.2.5’s adapted to improve replication using similar mutations found in the B-lineage SARS-CoV-2 variants.ImportanceWhile both A- and B-lineage SARS-CoV-2 variants emerged and circulated together during the early months of the pandemic, the B-lineages that acquired Spike D614G eventually outcompeted all other variants. We show that the A-lineage variants eventually evolved mutations including Spike D614G and Spike L452R that improved their in vitro replication in human nasal epithelial cells in a temperature dependent manner, suggesting there are some highly selectable mutation landscapes that SARS-CoV-2 can acquire to adapt to replication and transmission in humans.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels associated with reduced hospitalization risk remain undefined. Our outpatient COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP), placebo-controlled trial observed SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels decreasing 22-fold from matched donor units into post-transfusion seronegative recipients. Unvaccinated recipients were jointly stratified by a) early or late transfusion (< 5 or >5 days from symptom onset) and b) high or low post-transfusion SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels (< or > geometric mean). Early treatment with high post-transfusion antibody levels reduced hospitalization risk-0/102 (0%) compared to all other CCP recipients-17/370 (4.6%; Fisher exact-p-0.03) and to all control plasma recipients-35/461 (7.6%; Fisher exact p-0.001). A similar donor upper/lower half antibody level and early late transfusion stratified analyses indicated significant hospital risk reduction. Pre-transfusion nasal viral loads were similar in CCP and control recipients regardless of hospitalization outcome. Therapeutic CCP should comprise the upper 30% of donor antibody levels to provide effective outpatient use for immunocompromised and immunocompetent outpatients.