8 for the iStent inject Study Group* Purpose: Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an ab interno implanted (iStent inject) Trabecular Micro-Bypass System (Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA) in combination with cataract surgery in subjects with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Design: Prospective, randomized, single-masked, concurrently controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Participants: Eyes with mild to moderate POAG and preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) 24 mmHg on 1 to 3 medications, unmedicated diurnal IOP (DIOP) 21 to 36 mmHg, and cataract requiring surgery. Methods: After uncomplicated cataract surgery, eyes were randomized 3:1 intraoperatively to ab interno implantation of iStent inject (Model G2-M-IS; treatment group, n ¼ 387) or no stent implantation (control group, n ¼ 118). Subjects were followed through 2 years postoperatively. Annual washout of ocular hypotensive medication was performed. Main Outcome Measures: Effectiveness end points were !20% reduction from baseline in month 24 unmedicated DIOP and change in unmedicated month 24 DIOP from baseline. Safety measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), slit-lamp and fundus examinations, gonioscopy, pachymetry, specular microscopy, visual fields, complications, and adverse events. Results: The groups were well balanced preoperatively, including medicated IOP (17.5 mmHg in both groups) and unmedicated DIOP (24.8AE3.3 mmHg vs. 24.5AE3.1 mmHg in the treatment and control groups, respectively, P ¼ 0.33). At 24 months, 75.8% of treatment eyes versus 61.9% of control eyes experienced !20% reduction from baseline in unmedicated DIOP (P ¼ 0.005), and mean reduction in unmedicated DIOP from baseline was greater in treatment eyes (7.0AE4.0 mmHg) than in control eyes (5.4AE3.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). Of the responders, 84% of treatment eyes and 67% of control eyes were not receiving ocular hypotensive medication at 23 months. Furthermore, 63.2% of treatment eyes versus 50.0% of control eyes had month 24 medication-free DIOP 18 mmHg (difference 13.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9e23.4). The overall safety profile of the treatment group was favorable and similar to that in the control group throughout the 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: Clinically and statistically greater reductions in IOP without medication were achieved after iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery versus cataract surgery alone, with excellent safety through 2 years.

No abstract

for the INN005 Study Group* Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Design: One-year results from a 2-year, prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority study (NCT01881425) conducted in the United States and Europe.Participants: Eligible patients were aged 40e85 years with intraocular pressure (IOP) !15 and 40 mmHg and mild-to-severe POAG inadequately controlled on maximum tolerated medical therapy.Methods: Patients were randomized 3:1 to undergo stand-alone MicroShunt implantation or trabeculectomy, both performed with adjunctive mitomycin C (0.2 mg/ml for 2 minutes).Main Outcome Measures: The primary effectiveness end point was surgical success, defined as !20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP from baseline (no medication washout) at year 1 without increasing the number of glaucoma medications. Secondary effectiveness end points at year 1 were the mean IOP change from baseline and requirement for postoperative intervention. Additional end points included glaucoma medication use and adverse events.Results: Overall, 395 (MicroShunt) and 132 (trabeculectomy) patients were randomized (mean Humphrey visual field mean deviation, À12.34 decibels [dB]). At year 1, probability of success was lower in the MicroShunt group compared with the trabeculectomy group (53.9% vs. 72.7%, respectively; P < 0.01). In the MicroShunt group, mean IOP AE standard deviation decreased from 21.1 AE 4.9 mmHg at baseline to 14.3 AE 4.3 mmHg (À29.1%; P < 0.01) at year 1, with a mean of 0.6 AE 1.1 glaucoma medications (baseline 3.1 AE 1.0; P < 0.01). In the trabeculectomy group, mean IOP decreased from 21.1 AE 5.0 mmHg to 11.1 AE 4.3 mmHg (À45.4%; P < 0.01), with a mean of 0.3 AE 0.9 glaucoma medications (baseline 3.0 AE 0.9; P < 0.01). Postoperative interventions, including laser suture lysis, were reported in 40.8% (MicroShunt) versus 67.4% (trabeculectomy) of patients (P < 0.01). Reported incidence of transient hypotony was higher in the trabeculectomy group versus the MicroShunt group (49.6% vs. 28.9%; P < 0.01). Vision-threatening complications were uncommon and reported in 1.0% of MicroShunt versus 0.8% of trabeculectomy patients.Conclusions: Probability of success was lower with MicroShunt compared with trabeculectomy. Although reductions in IOP and glaucoma medications over 1 year were observed in both groups, the trabeculectomy group had a lower mean IOP on fewer medications. Ophthalmology 2021;-:1e12

This 24-month multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated superior reduction in MDIOP and medication use among subjects with mild-to-moderate POAG who received a Schlemm canal microstent combined with phacoemulsification compared with phacoemulsification alone.

No abstract