With increasingly complex spine surgeries now being performed on a more comorbid patient population, the reconstruction of midline back wounds from these procedures is becoming a frequent dilemma encountered by plastic surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of various preoperative risk factors on postoperative wound healing complications after paraspinous muscle flap reconstruction of midline back defects. An Institutional Review Board-approved, 11-year, retrospective, office and hospital chart review was conducted. All adult patients who underwent paraspinous muscle flap reconstruction during the study period were included. There were 92 patients in the study, representing the largest reported series to-date for the paraspinous muscle flap procedure. Mean follow-up was 120 days. Several wound-healing risk factors were present in this patient population: 72% were malnourished, 41% had hypertension, 37% were obese, 34% had a history of smoking, 32% had diabetes, 16% were on chronic steroids, 14% had a history of more than 2 previous spine surgeries, and 9% had a history of radiation to the wound area. Factors significantly (P < 0.05) associated with postreconstruction wound complications included history of traumatic spine injury, prereconstruction hardware removal, a history of more than 2 spine surgeries, hypertension, and lumbar wound location. This patient population possesses multiple comorbidities making complex wound healing difficult. Several specific risk factors are associated with an increased rate of postreconstruction wound complications after paraspinous muscle flaps. The paraspinous muscle flap remains an important tool for spinal wound reconstruction in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium.
The anatomy of the internal mammary vessels is poorly understood and thought to be unreliable clinically for use as a recipient vein in free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction. This study of 10 fresh cadaver thoracic cavities demonstrated by anatomic and dye resection studies that the internal mammary veins become smaller (< or = 2 mm) distally (fourth rib) and bifurcate [left (90 percent) > right (40 percent)], becoming unsuitable for consistent venous anastomoses at or below the fourth interspace. Furthermore, this study suggests that the most consistent interval is the third rib, which offers an appropriate recipient vein (40 percent > or = 3 mm on the left and 70 percent > or = 3 mm on the right). However, at the fourth interspace, 20 percent of the cadaver specimens had a vein on one side that was 1 mm or less and therefore unsuitable as a recipient. This enhanced understanding of the anatomy (size, location, and consistency) of the internal mammary recipient veins offers our patients another recipient option to enhance the safety and technical ease of microvascular breast reconstruction.
Definitive repair of recurrent ventral hernias using abdominal wall reconstruction techniques is an essential tool in the armentarium for general and plastic surgeons. Despite the great morbidity associated with incisional hernia, no consensus exists on the best means for treatment (Korenkov et al, Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386:65-73). Ramirez et al (Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;83:519-526) describes the "component separation" technique to mobilize the rectus-abdominus internal oblique and external oblique flap to correct the defect. This retrospective institutional study reviewed 10 years of myofascial flap reconstruction from 1996 to 2006 at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and revealed an 18.3% recurrence rate in 545 component separations. We identified obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2), age >65 years old, male gender, postoperative seroma, and preoperative infection as risk factors for hernia recurrence.
This retrospective study reviews 720 patients referred for evaluation of their silicone gel-filled breast implants from December of 1992 to January of 1996. Of the 720 patients evaluated, 282 (39.2 percent) subsequently underwent explantation, and 59 of these patients (20.9 percent) had a breast contouring procedure performed at the time of explantation. Our definition of explantation is the operative removal of the implant as well as the implant capsule. The overall complication rate for explantation was 5 out of 282 patients (1.8 percent), whereas the rate of complication among the patients who underwent simultaneous breast contouring was 2 out of 59 patients (3.4 percent). This article presents the management of the breast following explantation, implant removal, and capsulectomy. We review both the preoperative assessment of patients seeking explantation and our technique of explantation. Additionally, we address the importance of preoperative breast ptosis in technique selection and have developed a practical clinical algorithm for guiding simultaneous explantation and breast contouring. We also identify those patients who should undergo delayed breast contouring due to associated risk factors (smoking, need for > 4 cm of nipple movement, and paucity of breast parenchyma).
The data suggest that there was no reduction in the overall rate of total complications, infection, or CC with postoperative prophylactic antibiotics for either primary or secondary cosmetic breast augmentation. This study provides Level 3 evidence in support of discontinuing prophylactic postoperative antibiotics following cosmetic breast augmentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.