<i>Objective:</i> To determine if the bihormonal bionic
pancreas (BHBP) improves glycemic control and reduces hypoglycemia in
individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) and post-pancreatectomy
diabetes (PPD) compared with usual care (UC).
<p><i>Methods</i>: Ten subjects with HI and PPD completed
this open-label, crossover pilot study. Co-primary outcomes were mean glucose concentration
and time with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose concentration <3.3
mmol/L.</p>
<p><i>Results</i>: Mean (SD) CGM glucose concentration was
8.3 mmol/L (0.7) in the BHBP period vs. 9 mmol/L (1.8) in the UC period (p=0.13).
Mean (SD) time with CGM glucose concentration <3.3 mmol/L was 0% (0.002) in
the BHBP period vs. 1.3% (0.018) in the UC period (p=0.11). </p>
<p><i>Conclusion</i>:
Relative to UC, the BHBP resulted in comparable glycemic control in our
population. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the performance of the iLet® bionic pancreas (BP) in non-Hispanic Whites (‘Whites’) and in Blacks, Hispanics, and others (‘Minorities’).</p>
<p><strong>Research Design and Methods:</strong> A multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated glycemic management with the BP versus standard-of-care (SC) in 161 adult and 165 pediatric participants with type 1 diabetes over 13 weeks. </p>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> In Whites (N=240), the mean baseline-adjusted difference in 13-week HbA1c between the BP and SC groups was -0.45% (95% CI -0.61% to -0.29% [-4.9, -6.6 to -3.1 mmol/mol]; P<0.001), while this difference among Minorities (N=84) was -0.53% (-0.83% to -0.24% [-6.0, -9.2 to -2.8 mmol/mol]; P<0.001). In Whites, the mean baseline-adjusted difference in TIR between the BP and SC groups was 10% (7 to 12%; P<0.001), while in Minorities it was 14% (10 to 18%; P<0.001). </p>
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The BP improves glycemic control in both Whites and Minorities and offers promise in decreasing health care disparities. </p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.