Organism engineering requires the selection of an appropriate chassis, editing its genome, combining traits from different source species, and controlling genes with synthetic circuits. When a strain is needed for a new target objective, for example, to produce a chemical-of-need, the best strains, genes, techniques, software, and expertise may be distributed across laboratories. Here, we report a project where we were assigned phloroglucinol (PG) as a target, and then combined unique capabilities across the United States Army, Navy, and Air Force service laboratories with the shared goal of designing an organism to produce this molecule. In addition to the laboratory strain Escherichia coli, organisms were screened from soil and seawater. Putative PG-producing enzymes were mined from a strain bank of bacteria isolated from aircraft and fuel depots. The best enzyme was introduced into the ocean strain Marinobacter atlanticus CP1 with its genome edited to redirect carbon flux from natural fatty acid ester (FAE) production. PG production was also attempted in Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium acetobutylicum. A genetic circuit was constructed in E. coli that responds to PG accumulation, which was then ported to an in vitro paper-based system that could serve as a platform for future low-cost strain screening or for in-field sensing. Collectively, these efforts show how distributed biotechnology laboratories with domain-specific expertise can be marshalled to quickly provide a solution for a targeted organism engineering project, and highlights data and material sharing protocols needed to accelerate future efforts.
Cell-free expression systems have drawn increasing attention as a tool to achieve complex biological functions outside of the cell. Several applications of the technology involve the delivery of functionality to challenging environments, such as fieldforward diagnostics or point-of-need manufacturing of pharmaceuticals. To achieve these goals, cell-free reaction components are preserved using encapsulation or lyophilization methods, both of which often involve an embedding of components in porous matrices like paper or hydrogels. Previous work has shown a range of impacts of porous materials on cell-free expression reactions. Here, we explored a panel of 32 paperlike materials and 5 hydrogel materials for the impact on reaction performance. The screen included a tolerance to lyophilization for reaction systems based on both cell lysates and purified expression components. For paperlike materials, we found that (1) materials based on synthetic polymers were mostly incompatible with cell-free expression, (2) lysate-based reactions were largely insensitive to the matrix for cellulosic and microfiber materials, and (3) purified systems had an improved performance when lyophilized in cellulosic but not microfiber matrices. The impact of hydrogel materials ranged from completely inhibitory to a slight enhancement. The exploration of modulating the rehydration volume of lyophilized reactions yielded reaction speed increases using an enzymatic colorimetric reporter of up to twofold with an optimal ratio of 2:1 lyophilized reaction to rehydration volume for the lysate system and 1.5:1 for the purified system. The effect was independent of the matrices assessed. Testing with a fluorescent nonenzymatic reporter and no matrix showed similar improvements in both yields and reaction speeds for the lysate system and yields but not reaction speeds for the purified system. We finally used these observations to show an improved performance of two sensors that span reaction types, matrix, and reporters. In total, these results should enhance efforts to develop field-forward applications of cell-free expression systems.
Colorimetric reporter enzymes are useful for generating eye-readable biosensor readouts that do not require a device to interpret, an attractive property for applications in remote or developing parts of the world. The use of cell-free gene expression further facilitates such applications via amenability to lyophilization and incorporation into materials like paper. Currently, detection of multiple analytes simultaneously with these systems requires multiple reactions or a device. Here we evaluate seven enzymes and 15 corresponding substrates for functionality in a particular cell-free expression system known as PURE. We report eight enzyme/substrate pairs spanning four enzymes that are compatible with PURE. Of the four enzymes, three pairings exhibit no cross-reactivity. We finally show that at least one pairing can be used to create a third color when both are present, highlighting the potential use of these reporters for multiplex sensing.
Novel ways to track and verify items of a high value or security is an ever-present need. Taggants made from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) have several advantageous properties, such as high information density and robust synthesis; however, existing methods require laboratory techniques to verify, limiting applications. Here, we leverage DNA nanotechnology to create DNA taggants that can be validated in the field in seconds to minutes with a simple equipment. The system is driven by toehold-mediated strand-displacement reactions where matching oligonucleotide sequences drive the generation of a fluorescent signal through the potential energy of base pairing. By pooling different “input” oligonucleotide sequences in a taggant and spatially separating “reporter” oligonucleotide sequences on a paper ticket, unique, sequence-driven patterns emerge for different taggant formulations. Algorithmically generated oligonucleotide sequences show no crosstalk and ink-embedded taggants maintain activity for at least 99 days at 60 °C (equivalent to nearly 2 years at room temperature). The resulting fluorescent signals can be analyzed by the eye or a smartphone when paired with a UV flashlight and filtered glasses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.