The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) allows listing of subspecies and other groupings below the rank of species. This provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service with a means to target the most critical unit in need of conservation. While roughly one-quarter of listed taxa are subspecies, these management agencies are hindered by uncertainties about taxonomic standards during listing or delisting activities. In a review of taxonomic publications and societies, we found few subspecies lists and none that stated standardized criteria for determining subspecific taxa. Lack of criteria is attributed to a centuries-old debate over species and subspecies concepts. However, the critical need to resolve this debate for ESA listings lead us to propose that minimal biological criteria to define disjunct subspecies (legally or taxonomically) should include the discreteness and significance criteria of Distinct Population Segments (as defined under the ESA). Our subspecies criteria are in stark contrast to that proposed by supporters of the Phylogenetic Species Concept and provide a clear distinction between species and subspecies. Efforts to eliminate or reduce ambiguity associated with subspecies-level classifications will assist with ESA listing decisions. Thus, we urge professional taxonomic societies to publish and periodically update peer-reviewed species and subspecies lists. This effort must be paralleled throughout the world for efficient taxonomic conservation to take place.

✓ The increasing use of the transsphenoidal approach to sellar tumors has created a need for more detailed information about the neurovascular relationships of the sphenoid sinus. To better define this anatomy, 25 sphenoid sinuses were examined in cadavers, with attention to the neural and vascular structures in the lateral wall of the sinus. Three structures produced prominent bulges into the lateral wall of the sinus; they were 1) the optic nerves, 2) the carotid arteries, and 3) the maxillary branches of the trigeminal nerve. Over half of these structures had a bone thickness of less than 0.5 mm separating them from the sphenoid sinus, and in a few cases, they were separated by only sinus mucosa and dura. 1) The optic canals protruded into the superolateral part of the sphenoid sinus in all except one side of one specimen. In 4% of the optic nerves, only the optic sheath and sinus mucosa separated the nerves from the sinus, and in 78%, less than a 0.5-mm thickness of bone separated them. 2) The carotid arteries produced a prominent bulge into the sphenoid sinus in all but one side of one specimen. In 8% of the carotid arteries there were areas where no bone separated the artery and the sinus. 3) The maxillary branches of trigeminal nerves bulged into the inferolateral part of the sphenoid sinus in all except one side of two specimens. One side of one specimen had no bone, and 70% had less than a 0.5-mm thickness of bone separating the nerve from the sinus. The importance of these findings in transsphenoidal surgery is reviewed.

The available scientific literature was reviewed to assess the taxonomic standing of North American wolves, including subspecies of the gray wolf, Canis lupus. The recent scientific proposal that the eastern wolf, C. l. lycaon, is not a subspecies of gray wolf, but a full species, Canis lycaon, is well-supported by both morphological and genetic data. This species' range extends westward to Minnesota, and it hybridizes with gray wolves where the two species are in contact in eastern Canada and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Genetic data support a close relationship between eastern wolf and red wolf Canis rufus, but do not support the proposal that they are the same species; it is more likely that they evolved independently from different lineages of a common ancestor with coyotes. The genetic distinctiveness of the Mexican wolf Canis lupus baileyi supports its recognition as a subspecies. The available genetic and morphometric data do not provide clear support for the recognition of the Arctic wolf Canis lupus arctos, but the available genetic data are almost entirely limited to one group of genetic markers (microsatellite DNA) and are not definitive on this question. Recognition of the northern timber wolf Canis lupus occidentalis and the plains wolf Canis lupus nubilus as subspecies is supported by morphological data and extensive studies of microsatellite DNA variation where both subspecies are in contact in Canada. The wolves of coastal areas in southeastern Alaska and British Columbia should be assigned to C. lupus nubilus. There is scientific support for the taxa recognized here, but delineation of exact geographic boundaries presents challenges. Rather than sharp boundaries between taxa, boundaries should generally be thought of as intergrade zones of variable width.

No abstract

Mollusks and most non-mammalian vertebrates have been characterized as evolving an order of magnitude more slowly in morphology and karyotype compared with most groups of placental mammals. New calculations of the previously used measures of chromosomal rates of evolution for different groups of gastropods, using a larger and taxonomically broader sample, indicate that these rates had been previously underestimated, although they are still lower than those of the most rapidly evolving placental groups. When genera of approximately the same geological age are compared, little difference (less than an order of magnitude) in fossil-based measures of average rate of karyotypic evolution are found among placental mammals, frogs, lizards, and snails. Variation in rates within major groups obtained from the limited available data does not allow clear generalizations on among-group differences in chromosomal rates of evolution.