Purpose: To analyze the postoperative course, specifically postoperative complications, of pediatric patients who underwent cataract surgery by a single surgeon. The type of wound closure was compared to provide an evidence-based approach to surgical technique in pediatric cataract surgery. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed pediatric patients who underwent cataract extraction by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020. Excluded from the study were patients with postoperative follow-up of less than 1 month. The primary outcome compared postoperative complications between patients with sutured and sutureless wound closure. Other outcomes analyzed included intraocular pressure, mean corrected distance visual acuity, and incidence of procedure needed to remove posterior capsule opacification. Results: The study comprised 116 eyes with sufficient follow-up; 86 had sutureless wound closure and 30 had sutured wound closure. An intraocular lens was placed in 52% of eyes in the sutureless group and in 80% of eyes in the sutured group. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure between groups. The best corrected distance visual acuity was better in the sutured group at 6 months but not at the most recent follow-up visit. No cases of endophthalmitis were found in either group. There was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of retinal detachments and iris prolapse. Conclusions: The incidence of endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and iris prolapse was similar between pediatric patients who underwent cataract removal with sutureless versus sutured wound closure. Therefore, it may be reasonable to avoid the suture after pediatric cataract surgery. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2023;60(2):147–151.]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.