Background When chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) fails to respond to medical therapy, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) plays an integral role in management. Some studies have shown that middle turbinate resection (MTR) during ESS leads to decreased polyp recurrence and revision ESS rates. Other studies suggest MTR can lead to complications. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of MTR during ESS for CRSwNP by determining the incidences of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and postoperative complete frontal stenosis. Methods A multiinstitutional, prospective case series of 91 adult CRSwNP patients was conducted. Patients with medically refractory CRSwNP underwent primary or revision ESS plus MTR by 3 surgeons. Two of the surgeons performed partial MTRs, and one of the surgeons performed complete MTRs. Patients were evaluated for the following complications: intraoperative CSF leak during MTR, postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and postoperative complete frontal ostial stenosis. Secondary outcomes included changes from preoperative to postoperative 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores and revision ESS rates. Results Unilateral or bilateral complete ESSs with MTRs were performed on 91 CRSwNP patients. In total, 173 MTRs were performed. Two surgeons performed 97 partial MTRs on 49 patients, and the third surgeon performed 76 complete MTRs on 42 patients. One CSF leak occurred during partial MTR (1/173, 0.57%). No patients suffered postoperative epistaxis requiring operative intervention, and no patients developed complete frontal stenosis. From preoperatively to postoperatively, mean SNOT-22 scores decreased from 53.7 to 13.1 ( P = .001). No revision ESS was needed during the follow-up period. Mean follow-up time was 7.5 ± 5.4 months. Conclusions Partial and complete MTR during ESS for CRSwNP in this cohort resulted in very low, acceptable intraoperative and short-term postoperative complication rates and no detriment to SNOT-22 scores.
Previous reports of congenital pharyngeal webs, although rare, have been described in children. Clinical presentation varies, ranging from aspiration to intermittent airway obstruction, and most commonly, dysphagia. In this case report, the authors describe an unusual finding of a hypopharyngeal web in an adult patient. This patient had no prior history of chemoradiotherapy, malignancy, or total laryngectomy, all of which have been associated with acquired pharyngeal stenosis, supporting that this finding was of congenital origin. After a review of the possible embryological developmental abnormalities, the hypothesis is that of gut recanalization failure during development. CASE PRESENTATION CASE PRESENTATION We present a case of a woman in her mid-40's with a history of solid food dysphagia resulting in a 20 kg weight loss over three months. The patient denied dysphagia progressing to liquids, pain with swallowing, and a history of alcohol or tobacco use. Upon examination of the larynx via laryngoscope, a congenital hypopharyngeal web was identified. Successful excision of the web via coblation restored proper drainage of the pyriform sinus into the esophagus and resulted in markedly improved swallowing function and weight gain. CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS Pharyngeal webs are rare findings, particularly in adult patients. These congenital anomalies can be safely and effectively treated endoscopically via coblation.
CONTEXT CONTEXT Thermal injury to the larynx and other pharyngeal structures as a result of food ingestion is a rare occurrence, particularly in an adult population. Since the 1970's, only a few cases have been reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a male in their early 30's with a history of left sided spastic hemiparesis and unilateral vocal fold paresis who ingested a sweet potato which resulted in supraglottic burns. The patient denied any prior swallowing difficulties. Conservative therapy with steroids, proton pump inhibitors (PPI's) and antibiotics were sufficient for full recovery without any lasting sequelae. CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates how careful attention should be paid to food temperature particularly in patients at higher risk of dysphagia. It also demonstrates how prompt diagnosis and implementation of appropriate medications can prevent permanent and debilitating damage.
Introduction:Oval window (OW) and round window (RW) reinforcement surgery has been used for symptomatic treatment of multiple clinical entities, most commonly perilymphatic fistula and superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Owing to the theoretical acoustically negative effect of stiffening the windows, there has been concern of an unfavorable effect on audiologic outcomes due to the procedure. The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate audiologic outcomes after OW and RW reinforcement.Methods:A retrospective review of patients undergoing transcanal OW or RW reinforcement was completed. Patients were evaluated both as a total group and as two groups separated into “third window” and “two-window” groups based on their specific diagnosis. Primary outcomes included changes in individual pure-tone thresholds, pure-tone average (PTA), air-bone gap, speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition scores (WRS) between the preoperative and postoperative groups.Results:Seventy-one patients were included in the study. The combined cohort demonstrated a significant postoperative 2.75 dB increase in the air conduction hearing level at 4000 Hz (p < 0.05). This was almost entirely accounted for by a 2.18 dB increase in the air-bone gap at this frequency (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in PTA, SRT, or WRS between in the combined group or in the subgroup analysis.Conclusion:OW and RW tissue reinforcement resulted in a statistically significant but likely clinically insignificant decrease in hearing at the 4000 Hz frequency. There was no worsening of PTA, WRS, or SRT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.