Learning by doing," it is often said, is the best way to master a new skill. For my students in research methods courses, though they are reluctant to appear indifferent to the history and theory of narrative, it is their own emerging practice that interests them the most. They want to learn how to "do" narrative, often assuming there are well-known and well-defined procedures that will form the backbone of the course. Instead, I propose that narrative research represents a group of problems not only in composing texts but in reading them. Thus, the syllabus includes books that demonstrate possibilities for narrative, work by scholars aware of how storytelling forms operate in the disciplines.In this, my approach differs from the kinds of "reading" that Amia Lieblich and her colleagues have fruitfully explored in their pedagogically oriented Narrative Research (1998). They focus on how primary sourcesfor example, the results of a life history interview-can be read in order to construct convincing research accounts. As a complement to such efforts, 199
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.