Several very rare forms of dementia are associated with characteristic focal atrophy predominantly of the frontal and/or temporal lobes and currently lack imaging solutions to monitor disease. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a recently developed technique providing quantitative relaxivity maps and images with various tissue contrasts out of a single sequence acquisition. This pilot study explores the utility of MRF‐based T1 and T2 mapping to discover focal differences in relaxation times between patients with frontotemporal lobe degenerative dementia and healthy controls. 8 patients and 30 healthy controls underwent a 3 T MRI including an axial 2D spoiled gradient echo MRF sequence. T1 and T2 relaxation maps were generated based on an extended phase graphs algorithm‐founded dictionary involving inner product pattern matching. A region of interest (ROI)‐based analysis of T1 and T2 relaxation times was performed with FSL and ITK‐SNAP. Depending on the brain region analyzed, T1 relaxation times were up to 10.28% longer in patients than in controls reaching significant differences in cortical gray matter (P = .047) and global white matter (P = .023) as well as in both hippocampi (P = .001 left; P = .027 right). T2 relaxation times were similarly longer in the hippocampus by up to 19.18% in patients compared with controls. The clinically most affected patient had the most control‐deviant relaxation times. There was a strong correlation of T1 relaxation time in the amygdala with duration of the clinically manifest disease (Spearman Rho = .94; P = .001) and of T1 relaxation times in the left hippocampus with disease severity (Rho = .90, P = .002). In conclusion, MRF‐based relaxometry is a promising and time‐saving new MRI tool to study focal cerebral alterations and identify patients with frontotemporal lobe degeneration. To validate the results of this pilot study, MRF is worth further exploration as a diagnostic tool in neurodegenerative diseases.
Parkinson's disease (PD) affects more than six million people, but reliable MRI biomarkers with which to diagnose patients have not been established. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a recent quantitative technique that can provide relaxometric maps from a single sequence. The purpose of this study is to assess the potential of MRF to identify PD in patients and their disease severity, as well as to evaluate comfort during MRF. Twenty-five PD patients and 25 matching controls underwent 3 T MRI, including an axial 2D spoiled gradient echo MRF sequence. T1 and T2 maps were generated by voxel-wise matching the measured MRF signal to a precomputed dictionary. All participants also received standard inversion recovery T1 and multi-echo T2 mapping. An ROI-based analysis of relaxation times was performed. Differences between patients and controls as well as techniques were determined by logistic regression, Spearman correlation and t-test. Patients were asked to estimate the subjective comfort of the MRF sequence. Both MRF-based T1 and T2 mapping discriminated patients from controls: T1 relaxation times differed most in cortical grey matter (PD 1337 ± 38 vs. control 1386 ± 37 ms; mean ± SD; P = .0001) and, in combination with normal-appearing white matter, enabled correct discrimination in 85.7% of cases (sensitivity 83.3%; specificity 88.0%; receiver-operating characteristic [ROC]) area under the curve [AUC] 0.87), while for T2 mapping the left putamen was the strongest classifier (40.54 ± 6.28 vs. 34.17 ± 4.96 ms; P = .0001), enabling differentiation of groups in 84.0% of all cases (sensitivity 80.0%; specificity 88.0%; ROC AUC 0.87). Relaxation time differences were not associated with disease severity. Standard mapping techniques generated significantly different relaxation time values and identified other structures as different between groups other than MRF. Twenty-three out of 25 PD patients preferred the MRF examination instead of a standard MRI. MRF-based mapping can identify PD patients with good comfort but
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.