Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the role of 18 fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for evaluating the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in primary and metastatic liver tumors compared with contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination (CEUS) and to find its place in overall staging and the follow-up diagnostic algorithm. Methods: PET/CT examinations were performed 2 months after RFA for 20 patients with a total of 34 liver lesions. CEUS was performed within 10 days after PET/CT, and the results were compared. Seven patients were staged with PET/CT and the others with a contrast-enhanced CT. Results: A total of 48 18 F-FDG PET/CT examinations were performed. We observed complete response in 8 patients (40%), 2 patients (10%) had stable disease, one (5%) had partial response, and 9 patients (45%) had progression (including 2 cases with extrahepatic involvement). Compared with CEUS, there was a mismatch in 3 cases. Five patients underwent additional RFA for 7 lesions. Conclusion: According to our preliminary data, PET/CT may be a valuable method, with comparable or eventually even better sensitivity than CEUS, for early evaluation of the efficacy of RFA for the treatment of metastatic and primary liver lesions and planning of future treatment. PET/CT might be recommended as a staging method before undergoing RFA of liver lesions for determining the local extent of the disease in the liver in combination with CEUS with an advantage in visualization of extrahepatic involvement. However, more patients need to be investigated in order to demonstrate and confirm the obtained results with certainty.
IntroductionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents more than 90% of primary liver cancers and is a major global health problem. In the era of Direct acting agents (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV), sustained virological response (SVR) is achieved in more than 80% of cases. Accumulating clinical experience of DAA-based treatment has suggested that post-SVR HCC development and recurrence may be more frequent compared to interferon (IFN)-based treatment. We describe a case of poor differentiated HCC in non-cirrhotic liver, after HCV-eradication. Case presentation:A 73-year-old female presented with HCV-hepatitis at the beginning of 2017. A liver biopsy showed low grade fibrosis (F1). HCV genotype was 1b, with viral load 680 500 IU/ml. She was anti-HBc total positive, but negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNAnegative, and also anti-HIV 1/2 and had no history of alcohol or drug abuse. In May 2017 -treatment with IFN-free regime was started -3D -Viekirax and Exviera, without Ribavirin. At the 4th week of treatment HCV RNA was negative. At the 12th week abdominal ultrasound (US) showed a 60 mm liver nodule in 6th segment and a few more nodules form 10 to 32 mm. AFP was slightly elevated (59 ng/ml). Original ArticleMedInform I S S U E 2 , 2 0 1 8 MedInformThe contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed typical signs of HCC. Ultra sound (US)-guided biopsy was performed. Histological result was: Anaplastic carcinoma with stromal desmoplasia and expressed lymphocyte stromal reaction (a liver origin is possible). Immunohistochemistry test showed: Alpha-feto protein -negative reaction; Ca 19-9 -negative reaction, but Ki67 -40% proliferative activity. The patient was at stage B according to Barcelona-clinic liver cancer (BCLC) classification and treatment with Sorafenib was started. Discussion:Sequence of chronic hepatitis -cirrhosis -HCC is well known. In these cases the major role in oncogenesis is due to severe fibrosis and inflammation. HCC in non-cirrhotic liver is not well understood.The oncogenic potential of core protein of HCV has been discussed and therefore HCV is directly involved in hepatocarcinogenesis. Recent studies show higher frequency of HCC in patients with 1b HCV infection. In presented case -the patient was infected with HCV subgenotype 1b and had very low stage of fibrosis. But she was anti HBcor -positive and after HCV eradication. Several studies suggested a possibly distinct difference in host immune modulation between interferon and DAAs.Because of multiple character of HCC (more than 3 nodule, exactly 7 in this case), the initial treatment was Sorafenib. It was well tolerated and resent CT showed only two nodules. In this stage a RFTA is discussing.
Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents more than 90% of primary liver cancers and is a major global health problem. In the era of Direct acting agents (DAA) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV), sustained virological response (SVR) is achieved in more than 80% of cases. Accumulating clinical experience of DAA-based treatment has suggested that post-SVR HCC development and recurrence may be more frequent compared to interferon (IFN)-based treatment. We describe a case of poor differentiated HCC in non-cirrhotic liver, after HCV-eradication. Case presentation: A 73-year-old female presented with HCV-hepatitis at the beginning of 2017. A liver biopsy showed low grade fibrosis (F1). HCV genotype was 1b, with viral load 680 500 IU/ml. She was anti-HBc total positive, but negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNAnegative, and also anti-HIV 1/2 and had no history of alcohol or drug abuse. In May 2017-treatment with IFN-free regime was started-3D-Viekirax and Exviera, without Ribavirin. At the 4th week of treatment HCV RNA was negative. At the 12th week abdominal ultrasound (US) showed a 60 mm liver nodule in 6th segment and a few more nodules form 10 to 32 mm. AFP was slightly elevated (59 ng/ml).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.