Plant allometry is key for determining the role of forests in global carbon cycles, through the calculation of tree biomass using proxy measurements such as tree diameters or heights. Metabolic ecology theory (MET) considers the general principles that underpin allometry, but MET scaling relationships have been challenged on their lack of fit to empirical data and global applicability. We postulated that MET scaling is applicable only for plant tissues combining conductive and supportive functionality (tracheids), but as plants evolved tissues of specialized conductive functionality (vessels) their allometry progressed into more complex relationships. According to this principle, we deducted generalized MET (gMET) relationships with mechanistically deducted coefficients. Our gMET models proved to have exceptional empirical support against global datasets, achieving unbiased predictions across biomes worldwide. These results prove gMET models to be a crucial improvement to MET-based allometry, providing a universally applicable theoretical framework for worldwide estimations of forest carbon.
Plant allometry is key for determining the role of forests in global carbon cycles, through the calculation of tree biomass using proxy measurements such as tree diameters or heights. Metabolic Scaling Theory (MST) considers the general principles that underpin allometry, but MST scaling relationships have been challenged on their lack of fit to empirical data and global applicability. Many authors have thus optimised their model forms for statistical performance over theory based approaches. We postulated that MST scaling is applicable only to the proportion of plant tissue with supportive functionality, meaning that as plants evolved tissues of specialized conductive functionality (e.g vessels) their allometry progressed into more complex relationships. Our generalised MST (gMST) models were thus created by considering conductive lumen as unsupportive area, and consequentially removing it from the original MST 2/3 scaling. According to this principle, we deducted generalized gMST relationships with mechanistically deducted coefficients. We found that the gMST height-diameter scaling outperformed current state of the art equations that are widely used within the tropics and that the model performed well across all tested ecoregions. Furthermore, the proposed aboveground biomass models performed similarly to widely used models in the literature within the tropics. The results presented indicate that the further development of generalised allo-metric models remains a research priority given the importance of assessing and monitoring global forest carbon fluxes. The height-diameter models presented can thus be of much use to the wider community in further refining carbon stock estimates globally, providing a universally applicable theoretical framework.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.