Plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) significantly impact the nutritional ecology of terrestrial vertebrate herbivores. Herbivores have a wide range of mechanisms (herbivore offenses) to mitigate the negative effects of PSMs. We discuss several behavioral and physiological offenses used by terrestrial vertebrates. Several newly recognized herbivore offenses such as regulated absorption and regulation of toxin intake are presented. We give a detailed description of the biotransformation system with respect to PSMs. We also summarize recent findings of plant-animal interactions for lizards, birds, and mammals. Finally, we discuss some new tools that can be applied to long-standing questions of plant-vertebrate interactions.

Fear of predation is a universal motivator. Because predators hunt using stealth and surprise, there is a widespread ability among prey to assess risk from chemical information -scents -in their environment. Consequently, scents often act as particularly strong modulators of memory and emotions. Recent advances in ecological research and analytical technology are leading to novel ways to use this chemical information to create effective attractants, repellents and anti-anxiolytic compounds for wildlife managers, conservation biologists and health practitioners. However, there is extensive variation in the design, results, and interpretation of studies of olfactory-based risk discrimination. To understand the highly variable literature in this area, we adopt a multi-disciplinary approach and synthesize the latest findings from neurobiology, chemical ecology, and ethology to propose a contemporary framework that accounts for such disparate factors as the time-limited stability of chemicals, highly canalized mechanisms that influence prey responses, and the context within which these scents are detected (e.g. availability of alternative resources, perceived shelter, and ambient physical parameters). This framework helps to account for the wide range of reported responses by prey to predator scents, and explains, paradoxically, how the same individual predator scent can be interpreted as either safe or dangerous to a prey animal depending on how, when and where the cue was deposited. We provide a hypothetical example to illustrate the most common factors that influence how a predator scent (from dingoes, Canis dingo) may both attract and repel the same target organism (kangaroos, Macropus spp.). This framework identifies the catalysts that enable dynamic scents, odours or odorants to be used as attractants as well as deterrents. Because effective scent tools often relate to traumatic memories (fear and/or anxiety) that cause future avoidance, this information may also guide the development of appeasement, enrichment and anti-anxiolytic compounds, and help explain the observed variation in post-traumatic-related behaviours (including post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD) among diverse terrestrial taxa, including humans.

Southern elephant seals (Miroungo leonina) were immobilised with a mixture of tiletamine and zolazepam administered intravenously at a mean (sd) dose rate of 0.46 (0.08) mg/kg. This dose provided a satisfactory degree of anaesthesia with no side effects, and the induction, duration and recovery times were short. The mean (sd) induction time was 26 (9) seconds and the mean level of anaesthesia was 4.4 units on an eight-point scale. Male seals were given less drug than female seals, remained immobilised for shorter periods and recovered sooner. The mean (sd) dose of drug administered to males was 0.44 (0.06) mg/kg and to females 0.48 (0.08) mg/kg, and the mean (sd) duration times were 14.9 (4.5) minutes and 16.1 (5.3) minutes. The mean (sd) time taken to recover from immobilisation was 14.5 (4.6) minutes for males and 15.7 (5.3) minutes for females. Physiological condition and size significantly affected the duration of anaesthesia. Thin seals remained immobilised for 18 (7) minutes whereas fatter seals remained immobilised for 15 (4) minutes (P<0.0001).

Regulation of acid-base homeostasis is essential for mammals and birds. Biotransformation and metabolism of absorbed plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) results in the production of organic acids that threaten acid-base homeostasis. Consequently these acids must be buffered and excreted from the body. The production of an acid load from detoxified PSMs should occur in herbivorous mammals and birds and with most PSMs and so may provide a unifying theme to explain many effects of PSMs on animal metabolism. Since the organic acids will be largely ionized at physiological pH, disposal of the hydrogen ion and the organic anion may proceed independently. Most hydrogen ions (H(+)) from organic acids are eliminated by one or more of three ways: (1) when they react with bicarbonate in the extracellular fluid to form carbon dioxide and the carbon dioxide is exhaled, (2) when they bind to dibasic phosphate and are excreted by the kidney as monobasic phosphate, and (3) when they are buffered and retained in the skeletal system. The secretion of phosphate ions and ammonium excretion are two ways in which the kidney replaces bicarbonate ions that have been eliminated as carbon dioxide. Secretion in the kidney tubule is an important means of excreting excessive organic anions rapidly. This process is saturable and may be subject to competition from a variety of different metabolites. Lagomorphs have limited capacity to form new bicarbonate from ammonium excretion and may therefore be obliged to excrete other cations such as sodium to balance the excretion of organic anions from PSMs. Acidemia has wide-ranging impacts on animals but browsing mammals and birds may have to break down muscle tissues to provide for urinary ammonium in order to generate bicarbonate for buffering. Acidemia also can affect the extent of urea recycling. Animals consuming browse diets may have to regulate feeding so that the rate of formation of hydrogen ions does not exceed the rate of disposal. The mechanisms by which this could occur are unknown.

No abstract