Anesthesia-related oropharyngeal injuries are known to occur. Risk factors for intraoperative dental injuries include difficult intubation, use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe, motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring, poor dental hygiene, etc. Our patient was a case of a thalamic cavernoma who underwent craniotomy in a sitting position with the neck flexed along with MEP and TEE monitoring. At the end of the surgery, the lower three incisors were found to be subluxated. The subluxated teeth were stabilized using a 2-0 Ethilon suture in the operation room. Immediate dental consultation was sought postoperatively. Sitting position surgeries with associated neck flexion, simultaneous, advanced monitoring techniques like TEE and MEP, poor dental condition, and the use of hard bite blocks can predispose patients to dental injury. Preoperative dental evaluation and explanation of neuromonitoring-associated injuries can be beneficial.

Ondansetron is commonly used during the peri-operative period for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). It is a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT 3 ) receptor antagonist. Although relatively safe, few cases of ondansetron-induced bradycardia are described in the literature. Here, we present the case of a 41-year-old female with a burst fracture of the lumbar (L2) vertebrae following a fall from height. The patient underwent spinal fixation in the prone position. The intra-operative period was otherwise uneventful, except for an unprecedented incidence of bradycardia and hypotension following administration of intravenous (IV) ondansetron, at the time of closure of the surgical wound site. It was managed with IV atropine and fluid bolus. The patient was shifted to a intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good health on postoperative day three.

Background and Aims: Videolaryngoscopes have attained prime importance in securing the airway in children in the present era. McGrath videolaryngoscope is available with single-use non-channeled fog-free disposable blades of various sizes showing its efficacy for intubation in adults but still lacunae in data related to children. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, a total of 88 children of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II aged 1–10 years, weighing 10–20 kg undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled. Using the sealed envelope technique, the children were randomly allocated between Group G, in whom McGrath videolaryngoscope and Group M, in whom Macintosh laryngoscope was used for intubation. The primary aim was to compare intubation time between the two videolaryngoscopes. The secondary outcomes included glottic exposure time, Cormack and Lehane grading, number of attempts of intubation, intubation difficulty scale and complications. Statistical analysis was done using MedCalc software. The Student's t-test and Chi-square test were used for quantitative and categorical data, respectively. Results: The mean intubation time was comparable in both the groups (18.14 ± 17.80 s in Group G vs. 17.30 ± 16.74 s in Group M, P = 0.821). The mean time to glottic exposure was shorter (5.66 ± 4.58 vs. 8.50 ± 5.59 s, P = 0.0108) with decreased number of attempts of tube insertion and less incidences of trauma observed in patients with Group G as opposed to Group M. The Cormack and Lehane grading showed better glottic view in Group G. Conclusion: McGrath videolaryngoscope is as useful as the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in children with the added advantages of a better view of the larynx, lesser attempts to intubation, and fewer incidence of trauma.

Postoperative sore throat (POST) following endotracheal intubation during general anaesthesia (GA) is a common complication that leads to patient pain and is estimated to occur in approximately 21-65 percent of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of topical ketamine administration by nebulization in reducing the occurrence and severity of POST.After given written informed consent, a total of 134 patients with ASA I-II in the age range of 18-60 years, of either sex, undergoing surgery under GA were selected for this prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group S received 5.0 ml saline nebulisation, while group K got ketamine 50 mg (1.0 ml) in combination with 4.0 ml saline nebulization for 15 minutes. GA was induced 10 minutes after nebulization was completed. After extubating, and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively, POST monitoring was performed. POST was graded on a scale of 0 to 3.POST occurred in 44.03 percent of patients overall, with 41 patients in group S (61.19 percent) and 18 patients in group K (26.86 percent) experiencing POST throughout the study period. (0.001) (P = 0.001). At 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, the use of ketamine nebulization significantly reduced POST (P 0.05). At 2 h (P=0.04) and 4 h (P = 0.002) postextubation, the severity of sore throat was also greater in the saline group than in the ketamine group.Preoperative nebulized ketamine is helpful at reducing the occurrence and severity of postoperative sore throat without causing any adverse effects.

In lower leg surgeries involving fractures of distal tibia, ankle surgeries, debridement and PVD surgeries choice of anesthesia is usually regional anesthesia. When these patients are associated with co-morbid cardio-respiratory problems then it will become challenge for anesthesiologist to maintain homeostasis with good surgical anesthesia. Ayukut urfalioglu suggested another alternative technique in the form of Adductor canal block plus Lateral approach popliteal sciatic block as good alternative for these surgeries with better Intra-operative Haemodynamic Stability, additional post-operative pain relief and less requirement of systemic analgesia post-operatively.In this prospective randomised controlled trial, we aim to explore the efficacy of Adductor canal block plus Popliteal Sciatic Block for Lower leg surgeries. Sixty patients (ASA I, II, III) undergoing lower limb surgeries were randomly allocated in 2 groups (30 patients in each group). In Group P patients received PNS guided Adductor canal block combined with popliteal sciatic block and in group S patients received unilateral spinal anesthesia.: The primary objectives were to evaluate duration of sensory and motor block and post-operative pain relief. Secondary objectives included intra operative requirements of additional anesthesia and intraoperative haemodynamic stability.There was significant intraoperative haemodynamic stability and post-operative pain relief attributable to Group P. Time for first requirement of rescue analgesia post-operatively was significantly higher in Group P compared to Group S (Group P Mean SD15.9±5.26 vs 6.05±1.23 in Group S with p= < 0.0001).Combined adductor canal block and popliteal sciatic block can be an alternative technique with advantage of prolonged post-operative analgesia and haemodynamic stability.