No abstract

Morbid obesity is a severe chronic disease and subject to surgical methods for losing weight. This intervention is expected to drive to better quality of life and health status. Other important aspects which may be influenced are: HOMA-IR (as insulin resistance marker) and heart rate variability (as cardiac function and autonomic nervous system marker), which are independent and valid predictors of future cardiac, neurological, metabolic health. We pooled 4 studies (646 subjects) resulting to HOMA-IR and nine HRV components-grouped in those undergone to gastric bypass (RYGP) and those operated with vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) method. We performed a meta-analysis in patients for HOMA-IR and HRV, using Hedge's g correction of Cohen d for small samples. We concluded that RYGP favors insulin resistance decrease, whereas SG increases the vagal tone, improving cardiac function. The severity of cardiovascular diseases history suggests the selection of the surgery method: SG for the most severe cardiovascular cases and RYGP for those with higher HOMA-IR.

Background The World Health Organization named the phenomenon of misinformation spread through social media as an “infodemic” and recognized the need to curb it. Misinformation infodemics undermine not only population safety but also compliance to the suggestions and prophylactic measures recommended during pandemics. Objective The aim of this pilot study is to review the impact of social media on general population fear in “infoveillance” studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol was followed, and 6 out of 20 studies were retrieved, meta-analyzed, and had their findings presented in the form of a forest plot. Results The summary random and significant event rate was 0.298 (95% CI 0.213-0.400), suggesting that social media–circulated misinformation related to COVID-19 triggered public fear and other psychological manifestations. These findings merit special attention by public health authorities. Conclusions Infodemiology and infoveillance are valid tools in the hands of epidemiologists to help prevent dissemination of false information, which has potentially damaging effects.

No abstract