The effects of three methods of acute ureteric dilatation (by graded Teflon dilators, low and high pressure balloon dilators) were evaluated radiologically, renographically and histologically in minipigs. The minipig ureter was dilated from its normal calibre of 4 F to 10 F. All three methods caused upper urinary tract dilatation and an obstructive nephropathy which had not resolved 96 h after dilatation. Histology at 24 h showed destruction of the transitional epithelium, with inflammation throughout the ureteric wall. Four weeks after dilatation the ureter was still dilated and urothelial nests were seen in the lamina propria and in the muscle coats. There was no evidence of ischaemic necrosis or ureteric stricture formation. The implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.
In a four-year period 46 boys have been laparoscoped in the search for 55 impalpable testes. Thirty-three per cent of the testes were located intrabdominally. Another 53 per cent were absent. This could be diagnosed by laparoscopy alone in 35 per cent. Laparotomy was needed in only 3 boys to locate the testes.
The effects of irrigation with sterile and infected saline after acute ureteric dilatation by graded Teflon dilators were evaluated renographically and histologically in minipigs. The minipig ureter was dilated from its normal calibre of 4 F to 10 F, and 100 ml of sterile or infected saline were then introduced from a height of 60 cm under gravity. One week after irrigation and dilatation the ipsilateral kidney was either functioning less than 10% or there was an obstructive nephropathy. Histology at 3 months suggested that extravasation of infected irrigating fluid was the most likely cause of ureteric stricture formation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.