Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversions to open cholecystectomy are still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge about the rate and underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decide to review the rate and causes of conversion of our LC series. This study included 320 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies from January 2017 to December 2019 at Community Based Medical College Hospital Bangladesh, Mymensingh. All patients had surgery performed by same surgeon. Conversion to open cholecystectomy required in 15 (4.6%) patients. Out of 15 cases, the highest number of patients 10(66.6%) were in age group 50 to 59 years with a mean age of 60.1 years and standard deviation (SD) of 9.8 years. Of them 9 (60%) were male. The most common reasons for conversion of them were severe adhesions at calot's triangle 6 (40%) and acutely inflamed gallbladder 5 (33.3%), bleeding 2 (13%). No surgical procedures are complication free. The most common complication was superficial wound infection 8(2.5%). Delayed complications seen in our series is port site incisional hernia 2 (0.62%). Male gender, age older than 60 years, previous upper abdominal surgery, diabetes, and severity of inflammation were all significantly correlated with an increased conversion rate to laparotomy. LC is the preferred method even in difficult cases. This study emphasizes that although the rate of conversion to open surgery and complication rate are low in experienced hands, the surgeons should keep a low threshold for conversion to open surgery. CBMJ 2020 July: Vol. 09 No. 02 P: 14-18
The diabetic foot, the foot of diabetic patients with ulceration, infection and/ or destruction of the deep tissues associated with neurological abnormalities and various degrees of peripheral vascular disease in the lower limb is quite common. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out with an objective of assessing the common presentations and management outcome of diabetic foot. The study was carried out in the Surgery Department of Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh with a conveniently selected 130 patients of diabetic foot according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study period was one year. Out of 130 cases, the highest number of patients 55(42.4%) were in age group 50 to 59 years with a mean age of 60.1 years and standard deviation (SD) of 9.8 years. Majority of the patients 91(70.0%) were male. Of them, 83(91.2%) were smokers. Of 130, 51(39.2%) patients were illiterate and 41(31.5%) were farmer. Majority 67(51.53%) patients had history of uncontrolled diabetes for 10-15 years. Most of the patients, 97(74.6%) were presented with neuropathic ulcer, whereas 24(18.4%) ischemic ulcers and 9(7.0%) were infective ulcers, and majority of the lesions 49(37.7%) were located on toes. Highest number of patients, 44(33.8%) were treated conservatively, while 37(28.4%) were treated by debridement, dressing and resurfacing, 17(13.1%) were treated by incision and drainage, and 32(24.6%) patients were treated by amputation. Most of the patients, 108(83.1%) were cured, of them, 36(33.3%) were treated conservatively, while 31(28.7%) by debridement and dressing, 17(15.7%) were treated by toe disarticulation, 13(12.0%) by incision and drainage, 4(3.7%) by above knee amputation, 4(3.7%) by ray amputation and 3(2.8%) by below knee amputation. Illiterate male smokers in their 6th and 7th decades of life with uncontrolled diabetes are the victim of diabetic foot. Neuropathy, vasculopathy, infections and trauma are identified risk factors. Conservative treatment, debridement and dressing, off-loading, culture-guided antibiotics therapy and amputations are the most successful modalities. CBMJ 2017 July: Vol. 06 No. 02 P: 25-31
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.