Interferon-γ inducible human guanylate binding protein-1 (hGBP1) shows a unique characteristic that hydrolyses GTP to a mixture of GDP and GMP through successive cleavages, with GMP being the major product. Like other large GTPases, hGBP1 undergoes oligomerization upon substrate hydrolysis, which is essential for the stimulation of activity. It also exhibits antiviral activity against many viruses including hepatitis C. However, which oligomeric form is responsible for the stimulated activity leading to enhanced GMP formation and its influence on antiviral activity, are not properly understood. Using mutant and truncated proteins, our data indicate that transition-state-induced tetramerization is associated with higher rate of GMP formation. This is supported by chimaeras that are defective in both tetramerization and enhanced GMP formation. Unlike wild-type protein, chimaeras did not show allosteric interactions, indicating that tetramerization and enhanced GMP formation are allosterically coupled. Hence, we propose that after the cleavage of the first phosphoanhydride bond GDP·Pi-bound protein dimers transiently associate to form a tetramer that acts as an allosteric switch for higher rate of GMP formation. Biochemical and biophysical studies reveal that sequential conformational changes and interdomain communications regulate tetramer formation via dimer. Our studies also show that overexpression of the mutants, defective in tetramer formation in Rep2a cells do not inhibit proliferation of hepatitis C virus, indicating critical role of a tetramer in the antiviral activity. Thus, the present study not only highlights the importance of hGBP1 tetramer in stimulated GMP formation, but also demonstrates its role in the antiviral activity against hepatitis C virus.

Amyloid fibrillation is associated with several human maladies, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s diseases, prions, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and type 2 diabetes diseases. Gaining insights into the mechanism of amyloid fibril formation and exploring novel approaches to fibrillation inhibition are crucial for preventing amyloid diseases. Here, we hypothesized that ligands capable of stabilizing the native state of query proteins might prevent protein unfolding, which, in turn, may reduce the propensity of proteins to form amyloid fibrils. We demonstrated the efficient inhibition of amyloid formation of the human serum albumin (HSA) (up to 85%) and human insulin (up to 80%) by a nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug, ibuprofen (IBFN). IBFN significantly increases the conformational stability of both HSA and insulin, as confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Moreover, increasing concentration of IBFN boosts its amyloid inhibitory propensity in a linear fashion by influencing the nucleation phase as assayed by thioflavin T fluorescence, transmission electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering. Furthermore, circular dichroism analysis supported the DSC results, showing that IBFN binds to the native state of proteins and almost completely prevents their tendency to lose secondary and tertiary structures. Cell toxicity assay confirms that species formed in the presence of IBFN are less toxic to neuronal cells (SH‐SY5Y). These results demonstrate the feasibility of using a small molecule to stabilize the native state of proteins, thereby preventing the amyloidogenic conformational changes, which appear to be the common link in several human amyloid diseases.

The interferon γ‐inducible large GTPases, human guanylate‐binding protein (hGBP)‐1 and hGBP‐2, mediate antipathogenic and antiproliferative effects in human cells. Both proteins hydrolyse GTP to GDP and GMP through successive cleavages of phosphate bonds, a property that functionally distinguishes them from other GTPases. However, it is unclear why hGBP‐2 yields lower GMP than hGBP‐1 despite sharing a high sequence identity (~ 78%). We previously reported that the hGBP‐1 tetramer is crucial for enhanced GMP formation. We show here that the hGBP‐2 tetramer has no role in GMP formation. Using truncated hGBP‐2 variants, we found that its GTP‐binding domain alone hydrolyses GTP only to GDP. However, this domain along with the intermediate region enabled dimerization and hydrolysed GTP further to GMP. We observed that unlike in hGBP‐1, the helical domain of hGBP‐2 has an insignificant role in the regulation of GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that the differences in GMP formation between hGBP‐2 and hGBP‐1 arise from differences in their GTP‐binding domains. A large sequence variation seen in the guanine cap may be responsible for the lower GMP formation in hGBP‐2. Moreover, we identified the sites in the hGBP‐2 domains that are critical for both dimerization and tetramerization. We also found the existence of hGBP‐2 tetramer in mammalian cells, which might have a role in the suppression of the carcinomas. Our study suggests that sequence variation near the active site in these two close homologues leads to differential second phosphate cleavage and highlights the role of individual hGBP‐2 domains in the regulation of GTP hydrolysis.

No abstract

Interferon-gamma-inducible human large GTPases, hGBP1 and hGBP2, have a distinctive feature of hydrolyzing GTP to GDP and GMP through successive phosphate cleavages. In hGBP1, GMP is the major product, which is essential for its anti-pathogenic activities. However, its close homologue hGBP2 produces significantly less GMP, despite having a similar active site architecture. The molecular basis for less GMP formation and catalytic residue(s) in hGBP2 are not fully explored. To address these issues, we performed systematic biochemical, biophysical, and microsecond simulation studies. Our data suggest that the less GMP formation in hGBP2 is due to the lack of H-bond formation between the W79 side-chain (located near the active site) and main-chain carbonyl of K76 (present in the catalytic loop) in the substrate-bound hGBP2. The absence of this H-bond could not redirect the catalytic loop toward the beta phosphate after the cleavage of gamma-phosphate, a step essential for enhanced GMP formation. Furthermore, based on the mutational and structural analyses, this study for the first time indicates that the same residue, T75, mediates both phosphate cleavages in hGBP2 and hGBP1. This suggests the conservation of the catalytic residue in hGBP homologues. These findings emphasize the indispensable role of correct catalytic loop repositioning for efficient beta phosphate cleavage. This led us to propose a new substrate hydrolysis mechanism by hGBP1 and hGBP2, which may also be helpful to understand the GTP hydrolysis in other hGBP homologues. Overall, the study could provide insight into how these two close homologues play crucial roles in host-mediated immunity through different mechanisms.