The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of posaconazole, an investigational triazole antifungal, were evaluated following the administration of rising single and multiple oral doses. A total of 103 healthy adults were enrolled in two phase I trials. Each study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design with a rising single-dose (RSD) or rising multiple-dose (RMD) scheme. In the RSD study, subjects received single doses of posaconazole oral tablets (50 to 1,200 mg) or placebo. In the RMD study, subjects received posaconazole oral tablets (50 to 400 mg) or placebo twice daily for 14 days. By using model-independent methods, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the maximum concentration in plasma were determined and used to assess dose proportionality. In the RSD study, the levels of posaconazole in plasma increased proportionally between the 50-and 800-mg dose range, with saturation of absorption occurring above 800 mg. Dose proportionality was also observed in the RMD study. In both studies, the apparent volume of distribution was large (range, 343 to 1,341 liters) and the terminal-phase half-life was long (range, 25 to 31 h). Posaconazole was well tolerated at all dose levels, and the adverse events were not dose dependent. No clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory test values or electrocardiograms were observed. Following the administration of single and twice-daily rising doses, the level of posaconazole exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner. The long elimination-phase half-life of posaconazole supports once-or twice-daily dosing in clinical trials; however, additional studies are required to determine if further division of the dose will enhance exposure.The evolution of oral triazole antifungal agents began in the 1980s with the introduction of fluconazole and itraconazole for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. In recent years, the patterns of Candida infections have changed. Previously, Candida albicans was the most prevalent cause of Candida infections, whereas in recent times, other Candida species, such as C. glabrata and C. krusei, have become common infectioncausing pathogens (6). In addition to this shift in species, fluconazole-and itraconazole-resistant Candida strains have emerged, prompting clinicians to search for alternative treatment options. The emergence of new fungal diseases caused by fungi that were previously not thought to be pathogenic has also limited the usefulness of older triazole compounds for the treatment of invasive infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. For example, fusariosis and zygomycosis are increasingly common; however, the treatments for these infections are limited (23). In light of the need for more potent and broad-spectrum therapeutic options, posaconazole (SCH 56592), a novel oral triazole derivative structurally similar to itraconazole (Fig. 1), is in development for the treatment of invasive fungal infections.Posaconazole has enhanced activity against many old, new, and ...
The mass balance, pharmacokinetics, and biotransformation of JTZ-951 (enarodustat), a novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, were characterized in patients (N = 6) with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Following a 10-mg (100 µCi) oral dose of 14 C-JTZ-951, whole blood, feces, dialysate, and, if feasible, urine were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessments and for metabolite profiling and identification in appropriate matrices. Fecal excretion was the major route of elimination of radioactivity, and urinary excretion a minor route, with mean (coefficient of variation [%CV]) recovery of 77.1 (16.2)% and 10.9 (92.0)% of the dose, respectively. Radioactivity was not detected in the dialysate, and mean (%CV) total recovery in excreta was 88.0 (14.9)%. For parent JTZ-951 in plasma, the mean (%CV) effective half-life was 8.96 (7.7)% hours, and area under the curve over 24 hours comprised the majority (>80%) of total exposure, with relatively low variability in these pharmacokinetic variables. Based on profiling of plasma radioactivity, parent JTZ-951 was the predominant circulating component, accounting for 93.7% or more of radioactivity, and metabolite M2 (hydroxylated product) was the only detectable metabolite, but its exposure was minor (<5%) versus unchanged JTZ-951. In urine and feces, the predominant analyte was JTZ-951, and metabolite M2 was the predominant albeit minor metabolite, with small amounts of other metabolites. Thus, plasma exposure to drug-derived radioactivity was primarily due to parent JTZ-951, and the drug was cleared mainly by excretion of unchanged JTZ-951. The study appropriately characterized the disposition of JTZ-951 in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Plasma didanosine concentration data from 36 patients receiving once-a-day therapy and from 33 patients receiving twice-a-day therapy were subject to population pharmacokinetic analysis with the computer program NONMEM. Once- or twice-a-day regimens of didanosine were administered intravenously (i.v.) (dose: 0.8-33 mg/kg) during the first 2 weeks of therapy, and orally (dose: 1.6-66 mg/kg) for the remaining 4 weeks of therapy. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined after the first and last (steady-state) i.v. and oral doses. Population pharmacokinetic parameters for the combined i.v. and oral steady-state data were (mean [%CV]): systemic clearance, CL, 0.70 (5.2) L/h/kg; central compartment volume, Vc, 0.18 (32) L/kg; steady-state distribution volume, Vdss, 0.84 (6.8) L/kg; first-order absorption rate constant, Ka, 1.3 (9.5) hr-1; and bioavailable fraction, F, 0.34 (8.5). Interindividual variability (omega) was (%CV) 22.3 and 71.0 for CL and Vc, respectively. Intraindividual (residual) variability (sigma) in plasma concentrations (%CV) was 50.2. Body weight, sex, and age did not account for the variability in either CL or Vc, and the use of alternate pharmacokinetic models did not reduce the value of intraindividual variability. Population parameters for the combined i.v. and oral first-dose data were generally similar to those for the steady-state data. The parameters can be used to design dosing regimens in patients using the Bayesian feedback approach.
The dialysis clearance of enarodustat (JTZ‐951) was determined in patients (N = 6) with end‐stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Enarodustat (5 mg PO) was administered before (day 1) and after hemodialysis (day 8) with pharmacokinetic assessments on the 2 occasions. Dialysis clearance was based on plasma and dialysate enarodustat concentrations. Fraction of administered dose recovered in dialysate, total predialyzer and postdialyzer plasma enarodustat concentrations, and total and unbound venous plasma concentrations were determined. Hemodialysis did not significantly affect overall total concentrations with similar mean area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity (coefficient of variation) of 3350 (26.4%) and 3640 (20.9%) ng · h/mL on days 1 and 8, respectively, and mean terminal half‐life was 9.35 (11.9%) and 9.96 (18.7%) hours on the 2 occasions. Mean maximum concentration was somewhat lower on day 1 compared to day 8 (404 vs 559 ng/mL); the difference did not significantly affect total exposure (area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity). Plasma protein binding was high (>99%) with similar binding on the 2 occasions, and total pre‐ and postdialyzer enarodustat concentrations were similar. Plasma unbound enarodustat concentrations decreased during dialysis, with a postdialysis rebound presumably due to re‐equilibration with peripheral tissues. Mean unbound area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity was marginally lower (∼22%) on day 1 compared to day 8. Dialysis clearance (0.415 L/h) was insignificant relative to dialyzer plasma flow (∼20 L/h), and the fraction of administered dose recovered in dialysate was small (6.74% of dose) with low intersubject variability (coefficient of variation, 14.7%). Thus, enarodustat can be administered regardless of dialysis schedule, and dose supplementation is not required in patients with end‐stage renal disease on hemodialysis.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of population size, number of samples per individual, and level of interindividual variability (IIV) on the accuracy and precision of pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter estimates. Response data were simulated from concentration input data for an inhibitory sigmoid drug efficacy (E(max)) model using Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling, version 5 (NONMEM). Seven designs were investigated using different concentration sampling windows ranging from 0 to 3 EC(50) (EC(50) is the drug concentration at 50% of the E(max)) units. The response data were used to estimate the PD and variability parameters in NONMEM. The accuracy and precision of parameter estimates after 100 replications were assessed using the mean and SD of percent prediction error, respectively. Four samples per individual were sufficient to provide accurate and precise estimate of almost all of the PD and variability parameters, with 100 individuals and IIV of 30%. Reduction of sample size resulted in imprecise estimates of the variability parameters; however, the PD parameter estimates were still precise. At 45% IIV, designs with 5 samples per individual behaved better than those designs with 4 samples per individual. For a moderately variable drug with a high Hill coefficient, sampling from the 0.1 to 1, 1 to 2, 2 to 2.5, and 2.5 to 3 EC(50) window is sufficient to estimate the parameters reliably in a PD study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.