Objectives: The intestinal flora is closely related to the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study intends to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotics in the treatment of NAFLD through a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Methods: This study was conducted through a search of published randomized controlled trials using probiotic-related drugs for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (up to April 6, 2022). The JADAD evaluation table was used to evaluate the quality of the literatures included in the search, and the risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane evaluation manual. Finally, RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 21 randomized clinical trials involving 1037 patients with NAFLD were included in this study. Meta-analysis results showed that after probiotic intervention, liver function, blood lipid level, blood glucose levels and insulin levels were significantly reduced, which had a good effect on improving hepatic steatosis. However, it did not significantly improve BMI, inflammatory factors, or homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Through the subgroup analysis of the course of treatment, it was found that ALT, GGT, TG, and blood sugar improved better in the probiotic treatment course of greater than or equal to 12 weeks. Conclusion: This study shows that the use of probiotics therapy has a good regulating effect on liver function, steatosis, blood glucose level, insulin level and blood lipid level in NAFLD patients.

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic literature search up to June 2022 was performed and 6026 subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery at the baseline of the studies; 3090 of them were using the wound protector, and 2936 were using no wound protector. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery using the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single-ring wound protectors (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83, P = .004), and dual-ring wound protectors (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.56, P < .001) in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single-ring wound protectors, and dual-ring wound protectors in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 5 out of 28 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons. K E Y W O R D Sdual-ring wound protectors, lower gastrointestinal surgery, single-ring wound protectors, surgical site wound infection, wound protector Key Messages• we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery