No abstract

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is reported to be more prevalent particularly in patients with Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) because of the autonomic dysfunction, but prevalence of OH is not known in patients with Alzheimer Disease (AD). The aim of the present study was to determine whether OH can be used to distinguish DLB from AD. 38 patients with DLB, 88 patients with AD and 521 patients without dementia, underwent Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. OH were evaluated for the 1 st (OH1) and 3 rd (OH3) minutes, taking the data in supine position as the basis, by Head-Up-Tilt Test. Prevalence of OH1 was 43.2% in AD, 44.7% in DLB and 17.9% in patients without dementia, and OH3 was 44.3% in AD, 47.4% in DLB and 17.9% in non-dementia group. The frequency of OH1 and OH3 was higher in the AD and DLB groups than in the patients without dementia (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between DLB and AD in terms of OH (p>0.05). The percentage of asymptomatic patients with OH was 87.2% and 89.6% during 1 st and 3 rd minutes, respectively, and this percentage was similar in three groups (p>0.05, for each). There was no significant difference between the two dementia groups in terms of comorbidities, drugs and laboratory values (p>0.05). OH is more prevalent in patients with AD than controls and similar levels are observed in those with DLB. The prevalence of OH equally is greater with DLB or AD disease progression. Clinicians should be aware of OH and its related consequences in the management of the AD in older adults.

Abstract Background The relationship between sarcopenia and orthostatic hypotension (OH) is unclear. Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate associations between sarcopenia/sarcopenia severity and OH. Design A total of 511 patients attending a geriatric outpatient clinic were included. OH was defined as a decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 20 mmHg and/or ≥ 10 mmHg, respectively, when one transitions from the supine to an upright position. OH was measured by the Head-up Tilt Table test at 1, 3 and 5 min (OH1, OH3 and OH5, respectively). Sarcopenia and its severity were defined according to the revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Results The mean age of the sample was 75.40 ± 7.35 years, and 69.9% were female. The prevalence of probable sarcopenia, sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia was 42.2%, 6.06% and 11.1%, respectively. After adjustment for all covariates, systolic OH1, OH1 and systolic OH5 were statistically significantly different between severe sarcopenia and the robust group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.26, confidence interval [CI] 0.98–10.84; P = 0.05 for systolic OH1; OR 4.31, CI 1.31–14.15; P = 0.016 for OH1; OR 4.09, CI 1.01–16.55; P = 0.048 for systolic OH5). Only systolic OH1 was statistically different between the sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia groups (OR 2.64, CI 1.87–8.73; P = 0.012). OH1 and OH5 were statistically significant different between severe sarcopenia and probable sarcopenia groups (P &lt; 0.05); there was no relationship between the robust group and probable sarcopenia (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions There is a close relationship between sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia and OH in older adults. Therefore, when a healthcare practitioner is evaluating an older patient with sarcopenia, OH should also be evaluated, and vice versa.

No abstract

Background The aging population and increasing chronic diseases make a tremendous burden on the health care system. The study evaluated the relationship between comorbidity indices and common geriatric syndromes. Methods A total of 366 patients who were hospitalized in a university geriatric inpatient service were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, laboratory findings, and comprehensive geriatric assessment(CGA) parameters were recorded. Malnutrition, urinary incontinence, frailty, polypharmacy, falls, orthostatic hypotension, depression, and cognitive performance were evaluated. Comorbidities were ranked using the Charlson Comorbidity Index(CCI), Elixhauser Comorbidity Index(ECM), Geriatric Index of Comorbidity(GIC), and Medicine Comorbidity Index(MCI). Because, the CCI is a valid and reliable tool used in different clinical settings and diseases, patients with CCI score higher than four was accepted as multimorbid. Additionally, the relationship between geriatric syndromes and comorbidity indices was assessed with regression analysis. Results Patients’ mean age was 76.2 ± 7.25 years(67.8% female). The age and sex of multimorbid patients according to the CCI were not different compared to others. The multimorbid group had a higher rate of dementia and polypharmacy among geriatric syndromes. All four indices were associated with frailty and polypharmacy(p < 0.05). CCI and ECM scores were related to dementia, polypharmacy, and frailty. Moreover, CCI was also associated with separately slow walking speed and low muscle strength. On the other hand, unlike CCI, ECM was associated with malnutrition. Conclusions In the study comparing the four comorbidity indices, it is revealed that none of the indices is sufficient to use alone in geriatric practice. New indices should be developed considering the complexity of the geriatric cases and the limitations of the existing indices.