Photovoice research is conducted by researchers to communicate images or photographs, and it has high confidence in analyzing the value, story or meaning of an image. Several previous studies that examined photovoice as a research strategy were analyzed and reviewed. This systematic review used an article selection process. It was defining the purpose, conducting a literature search, pulling articles by reading abstracts, reading the full paper, data abstraction, and conducting an analysis. The photovoice article selection was classified into education, health, and social science domain. Finally, forty-one articles have been reviewed with the total of participants involved ranged from five to fifty individuals. The majority of research method in the articles was participatory action research (PAR) through qualitative inquiry or field visits. Meanwhile, the research instruments used photography, documentation, observation, and interviews. In various fields of research, photovoice is able to increase the understanding of individuals or groups to interpret the content of an image or photo.

Paradigma pembelajaran saat ini adalah Student Center Learning (SCL), yang dapat dicapai apabila pembelajaran khususnya pembelajaran fisika di SMA dirancang sedemikian rupa hingga dapat membelajarkan siswa. Salah satu desain pembelajaran (learning design) yang dapat digunakan untuk membelajarkan siswa adalah pembelajaran melalui pertanyaan–Learning by Questioning- (LBQ). LBQ berpotensi lebih memberdayakan keterampilan berpikir dan dapat mengkonstruk pengetahuan. Untuk itu sangat perlu dihasilkan contoh perangkat pembelajaran melalui bertanya (LBQ) dan selanjutnya diuji secara empiris. Artikel ini akan mendeskripsikan hasil-hasil pengujian empiris tersebut, sehingga rumusan masalah yang dikemukakan adalah bagaimanakah hasil implementasi perangkat pembelajaran melalui bertanya (LBQ) di kelas? Setelah dihasilkan contoh perangkat pembelajaran melalui pertanyaan (Learning by Questioning) yang terdiri dari dua topik fisika SMA: fluida statis yang sesuai dengan Kurikulum Tingkat satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), dan Hukum-hukum Newton sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013.Perangkat pembelajaran tersebut terdiri atas silabus, RPP, LKS dan panduannya, buku siswa, Lembar penilaian LBQ dan kuncinya. Selanjutnya terkait hasil uji empiris atau hasil implementasi perangkat pembelajaran di kelas, diperoleh temuan-temuan: (a) Penerapan pembelajaran bertanya (LBQ) dapat meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir siswa dengan perolehan gain peningkatan untuk 10 atribut keterampilan berpikir berada pada rentang 0,27 sampai 0,73 dengan rata-rata 0,48 (sedang), (b) Ditemukan delapan atribut keterampilan berpikir (80%) dari sepuluh yang diteliti yang konsisten dan dapat ditingkatkan dengan pembelajaran melalui pertanyaan (LBQ). Kedelapan atribut tersebut adalah menganalisis dan mensintesis (analizing and synthesizing), meningkatkan kualitas pertanyaan (raises questions), menggali informasi (information searching), menggunakan konsep (utilizes concept), membuat inferensi (makes inferences), membangun implikasi (generates implications), mengambil keputusan (making decision), dan memecahkan masalah secara kreatif (creative problem solving), (c) Guru model dan siswa merespons positif pembelajaran dengan LBQ. Guru model menilai 95 persen penerapan pembelajaran LBQ sesuai untuk diterapkan, sementara siswa memberikan jawaban positif sebesar 76,7%.

Scientific literacy is a person's ability to understand science, communicate science, and apply scientific knowledge to solve problems so that they have high attitudes and sensitivity to themselves and their environment in making decisions based on scientific considerations.  This study aims to determine the understanding of high school students regarding scientific literacy and to determine the effect of high school students' interest in learning on science literacy learning outcomes.  This study involved 201 high school students in Surabaya, Sidoarjo and Gresik.  This study uses a mixed-method, namely, by using a quantitative approach and a qualitative approach.  Quantitative analysis was perform using regression and correlation tests.  The qualitative research obtains from questionnaires and interviews with students. The answers from students categorized into four levels, namely a score of 0 (did not answer the questions), score 1 (responded to questions but not quite right), score 2 (answered correctly) and score 3 (answered correctly)  with exact categories).  From the research results, it can conclude that students' understanding of scientific literacy is still low.  The regression test where the significance value is 0.095> 0.05, which means that there is no influence of students' interest in learning on the results of students' scientific literacy skills, while the correlation test shows that the correlation between students' interests and the effects of scientific literacy skills (r)  is 0.118.  This indicates that there is a shallow relationship between students 'interest in learning and the consequences of high school students' scientific literacy skills.  This research recommended that students can improve their understanding of scientific literacy by getting used to reading scientific literacy before learning begins so that students' interest in reading scientific phenomena increases.

Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) are controversial topics that have a scientific basis and important to society. This study aims to analyze the trends of SSI research publications from 2011-2020, visualize SSI research trends and how Indonesian researchers contribute to SSI research. This study was conducted on April 18, 2021, using bibliometric analysis. Data obtained is 225 data and taken by using Scopus database with "socio-scientific issues in physics" as the keyword from 2011 until 2020. After that, the data mapping was carried out using VOS Viewer software. Based on the result research, it can be concluded that the most topic in SSI research is related to scientific literacy, argumentation, and global warming. The visualization result shows that SSI has many effects on science learning, especially to improve argumentation skills. From 35 countries, Indonesia became the largest contribution research documents in SSI by placing two representative institutions: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia and Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Indonesia also contributed the most prolific SSI writer, Widodo became the most prolific writer.