A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk AbstractMetal loss due to corrosion is a serious threat to the integrity of pressurised oil and gas transmission pipes. Pipe metal loss defects are found in either single form or in groups (clusters). One of the critical situations arises when two or more defects are spaced close enough to act as a single lengthier defect with respect to the axial direction, causing pipe ruptures rather than leaks, and impacting on the pressure containing capacity of a pipe. There have been few studies conducted to determine the distance needed for defects to interact leading to a failure pressure lower than that when the defects are treated as single defects and not interacting. Despite such efforts, there is no universally agreed defect interaction rule and pipe operators around the world have various rules to pick and choose from. In this work, the effects of defects shape and location on closely spaced defects are analysed using finite element analysis. The numerical results showed that defect shapes and locations have a great influence on the peak stress and its location as well as the failure pressure of pipes containing interacting defects.

The burst pressure of commonly used ductile steel pipes in oil and gas industries, i.e. X52 and X60, is measured under internal pressure loading. The pipes were machined with circular and boxed defects at different orientations to simulate actual metal loss defects. Defect shapes and orientations were investigated in detail to study how they affect the failure behaviour of interacting defects. The experimental burst pressure results were compared with those obtained using existing analytical methods from Design Codes. Comparison of the results showed conservatism in the existing analytical methods which may potentially lead to unnecessary plant shutdowns and pipe repairs. The outcome of the experimental tests revealed that the shapes of the defects have very small influence on the defect interaction behaviour. The burst tests interestingly showed that the defect orientation has an important effect on defect interaction. Defects oriented in the hoop and diagonal directions showed no defect interaction even when spaced by a distance of one wall thickness, while defects oriented in the longitudinal directions showed that defects interact even when the spacing is up to six wall thickness but the interaction fades away for defects spaced at longer distances. Highlights Experimental 31 pipe burst tests with machined metal loss defects analysed  The effects of defect shape, orientation and interaction are investigated  Results compared with existing analytical methods from Design Codes  Degree of conservatism in the existing design codes discussed  Results show that defect orientation has an important effect on defect interaction