No abstract

Introduction: The present study was undertaken with the objective to assess the efficacy of clinical case history based modular teaching learning method on the performance of undergraduate medical students as an adjunct to the traditional teaching methods in physiology. Materials and Methods: The present study was performed on first professional MBBS students of two consecutive batches of Nilratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata. After the first semester examination was taken, a significant deviation in teaching-learning method was employed. No case histories were discussed or introduced to the students of batch 2009-2010, batch 2010-2011 but they had been administered clinical case history based modules. Second semester examination was conducted where 25% of the questions were based on case histories for both batches while the remaining 75% of the questions consisted of non-case based items. Results: There had been no significant difference in performance (p = 0.246) in the first semester examination between the two batches. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the performances of the students of these two batches in case based items with batch 2010-2011 doing better. More importantly, performance of the students between these two batches differed significantly (p < 0.05) in favour of batch 2010-2011, where the marks obtained by them in non-case based items in the second semester examination was considered. Discussion: The authors concluded that clinical case based modules, when used as an adjunct to didactic lectures, not only served to enhance students' skill in tackling case based items, but also developed their critical thinking and higher ordered learning such that they became more adept at solving non case based items.

BackgroundIn 2020 WHO declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a global pandemic. To flatten the curve of infection, a nationwide lockdown was declared by the Indian government. All the schools and colleges were shut for an indefinite period. Like all other streams, medical education also got severely hampered. Adapting themselves to the changing environment, teachers started using different teachinglearning methods and media to get across to the students. The objective of the research was to study the perception of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID pandemic. MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted by the distribution of a pre-validated online questionnaire to medical students of West Bengal. From the collected data relevant statistical averages and census domains were calculated. The Chi-Square test was done and assessed with a p≤0.05 significance level. ResultsA significant increase was noted in the time spent by students on various online teaching activities (p<0.05). Video tutorials, e.g., YouTube was ranked as the most effective mode (17.2%), followed by live tutorials via Microsoft Teams, etc. (8.9%). A significant number (30.2%) of students strongly favoured online teaching over face-to-face teaching. Major challenges of online learning cited by students were internet connectivity issues (79.8%) followed by family distraction (37.9 %) and inconvenient timing of the classes (20.1 %). ConclusionOur study highlighted the benefits, disadvantages and barriers for online learning in the perspective of undergraduate medical education in India. Even though online mode of teaching was found to be beneficial in the context of COVID 19 pandemic, it cannot be used as an absolute substitution for face to face teaching in the given context.

Background:  Menstrual cycle is a regular coordinated physiological change in non-pregnant women. The variation of hormonal concentrations during different phases of the menstrual cycle has a profound influence on autonomic and metabolic activities. The present study was designed to assess the cardiovascular sympathetic functions during different phases of menstrual cycle in normal healthy eumenorrheic females.Methods:  Fifty females in the age group of 18-25 years were selected for the study. Non-invasive cardiovascular sympathetic function tests were performed during different phases of the menstrual cycle using RMS Polyrite D.Results: Results were analyzed using paired ‘t’ test. Resting blood pressure, blood pressure response to isometric handgrip test and cold pressor test were statistically significant higher (p-value <0.05), in the secretory phase as compared to menstrual and proliferative phase. Blood pressure response to orthostatic test was statistically significant between the proliferative and secretory phase and between menstrual and secretory phase (p-value <0.05).Conclusion: Our study shows that sympathetic activity is highest during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle and lowest in the proliferative phase as compared to the menstrual phase. This higher sympathetic activity may be correlated with higher estrogen and progesterone levels during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. The study also emphasizes the complex relationship between ovarian hormones and autonomic regulatory systems.