Regulatory guidance documents stress the value of assessing the most appropriate endpoints in multiple tissues when evaluating the in vivo genotoxic potential of chemicals. However, conducting several independent studies to evaluate multiple endpoints and/or tissue compartments is resource intensive. Furthermore, when dependent on visual detection, conventional approaches for scoring genotoxicity endpoints can be slow, tedious, and less objective than the ideal. To address these issues with current practices we attempted to (1) devise resource sparing treatment and harvest schedules that are compatible with liver and blood micronucleus endpoints, as well as the Pig‐a gene mutation assay, and (2) utilize flow cytometry‐based methods to score each of these genotoxicity biomarkers. Proof‐of‐principle experiments were performed with 4‐week‐old male and female Crl:CD(SD) rats exposed to aristolochic acids I/II, benzo[a]pyrene, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, diethylnitrosamine, 1,2‐dimethylhydrazine, dimethylnitrosamine, 2,6‐dinitrotoluene, hydroxyurea, melphalan, temozolomide, quinoline, or vinblastine. These 13 chemicals were each tested in two treatment regimens: one 3‐day exposure cycle, and three 3‐day exposure cycles. Each exposure, blood collection, and liver harvest was accomplished during a standard Monday–Friday workweek. Key findings are that even these well‐studied, relatively potent genotoxicants were not active in both tissues and all assays (indeed only cisplatin was clearly positive in all three assays); and whereas the sensitivity of the Pig‐a assay clearly benefitted from three versus one treatment cycle, micronucleus assays yielded qualitatively similar results across both study designs. Collectively, these results suggest it is possible to significantly reduce animal and other resource requirements while improving assessments of in vivo genotoxicity potential by simultaneously evaluating three endpoints and two important tissue compartments using fit‐for‐purpose study designs in conjunction with flow cytometric scoring approaches. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 60:704–739, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The current report describes a newly devised method for automatically scoring the incidence of rat hepatocyte micronuclei (MNHEP) via flow cytometry, with concurrent assessments of hepatocyte proliferation-frequency of Ki-67-positive nuclei, and the proportion of polyploid nuclei. Proof-of-concept data are provided from experiments performed with 6-week old male Crl:CD(SD) rats exposed to diethylnitrosamine (DEN) or quinoline (QUIN) for 3 or 14 consecutive days. Non-perfused liver tissue was collected 4 days after cessation of treatment in the case of 3-day studies, or 1 day after last administration in the case of 14-day studies for processing and flow cytometric analysis. In addition to livers, blood samples were collected one day after final treatment for micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) measurements. Dose-dependent increases in MNHEP, Ki-67-positive nuclei, and polyploidy were observed in 3- and 14-day DEN studies. Both treatment schedules resulted in elevated %MNHEP for QUIN-exposed rats, and while cell proliferation effects were subtle, appreciable increases to normalized liver weights were observed. Whereas DEN caused markedly higher %MNHEP when exposure was extended to two weeks, QUIN-induced MNHEP were slightly increased with protracted dosing. Parallel microscopy-based MNHEP frequencies were highly correlated with flow cytometry-based measurements (four study/aggregate R = 0.80). No increases in MN-RET were seen in any of the four studies. Collectively, these results suggest liver micronuclei are amenable to an automated scoring technique that provides objective analyses and higher information content relative to conventional microscopy. Additional work is needed to expand the number and types of chemicals tested, identify the most advantageous treatment schedules, and test the transferability of the method. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:176-187, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Regulatory guidance documents stress the value of assessing multiple tissues and the most appropriate endpoints when evaluating chemicals for in vivo genotoxic potential. However, conducting several independent studies to consider multiple endpoints and/or tissue compartments is resource intensive. Furthermore, conventional approaches for scoring genotoxicity endpoints are slow, tedious, and less objective than what would be considered ideal. In an effort to address these issues with current practices, we attempted to i) employ flow cytometry-based methods to score liver micronuclei, blood micronuclei, and blood Pig-a gene mutation, and ii) integrate the endpoints into a common general toxicology study design-the rat 28-day repeat dose study. A proof-of-principle experiment was performed with 6-week old male Crl:CD(SD) rats exposed to diethylnitrosamine (DEN) for 28 consecutive days. One day later blood was collected for micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) and Pig-a mutation assays, and liver tissue was obtained for micronucleated hepatocyte (MNHEP) scoring. MN-RET frequencies were not affected by DEN exposure, and mean Pig-a mutant cell frequencies were only slightly elevated. On the other hand, % MNHEP showed marked, dose-related increases (2.2, 7.2, and 9.1 mean fold-increase for 5, 10, 15 mg DEN/kg/day, respectively). Concurrent with MNHEP analyses, assessments of Ki-67-positive events and the proportion of 8n nuclei provided evidence for treatment-related changes to hepatocyte proliferation. Collectively, these results reinforce the importance of evaluating chemicals' genotoxic potential in liver in addition to hematopoietic cells, and suggest that several automated measurements can be successfully integrated into repeat-dose studies for higher efficiencies and better utilization of fewer animals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.