Bream in chilled storage were sensorially acceptable only up to 10 days, compared with 33 days for bream in partial freezing storage. Partial freezing delayed the nucleotide degradation of bream.

Summary Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) skin and muscle were hydrolysed, respectively, and then used as part of an edible coating to preserve fish. The effects of muscle and skin hydrolysates as edible coatings for shelf life extension of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were evaluated over 18 days at 4 °C, by comparing these two treatments, a chitosan coating with muscle hydrolysate, chitosan alone, and an untreated control. All coatings were made up with 5% glycerol. The quality of the carp was assessed by using total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB‐N), total viable counts (TVC), thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and K value. Compared with the control group, the rate of increase in TVB‐N, TVC, TBA and K value of carp coated with fish skin hydrolysates, fish muscle hydrolysates and chitosan added to fish muscle hydrolysates were lower. According to the total viable counts, the storage life of fish with fish skin hydrolysates coatings and chitosan added fish muscle hydrolysates coatings were 16 days, 2 days longer than those with the chitosan coatings and twice as long as the control group.

To investigate the effects of chitosan composite coatings for maintaining the quality of grass carp portions, indictors of microbiology (total bacteria count, TBC), chemistry (pH; total volatile basic nitrogen, TVB-N; 2-thiobarbituric acid, TBA; K-value), and sensory characteristics were analyzed periodically. The results showed that chitosan (1.5%, w/v) + acetic acid (1.0%, v/v) + tea polyphenol (TP, 0.5%, w/v) coating significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced growth of microorganisms as reflected in TBC, lipid oxidation as displayed in TBA, chemical spoilage as reflected in pH, TVB-N, K-value, and sensory characteristic scores compared to the control samples. The effect of chitosan (1.5%, w/v) + acetic acid (1.0%, v/v) + vitamin C (VC, 0.5%, w/v) coating was better than chitosan (1.5%, w/v) + acetic acid (1.0%, v/v) coating. Chitosan together with acetic acid and TP can be used as a type of preservative coating for grass carp portions under chilled storage.

No abstract