Archaeological, genetic, and linguistic evidence has supported the idea that northern China is the original center of modern Sino‐Tibetan‐speaking populations. However, the demographic history of subsequent southward migration and genetic admixture of Han Chinese with surrounding indigenous populations remain uncharacterized, and the language shifts and assimilations accompanied by movement of people, or just an adaptation of cultural ideas among populations in central China is still unclear, especially for Tibeto‐Burman‐speaking Tujia and central Han Chinese populations. To resolve this, we genotyped over 60K genome‐wide markers in 505 unrelated individuals from 63 indigenous populations. Our results showed both studied Han and Tujia were at the intermediate position in the modern East Asian North–South genetic cline and there was a correlation between the genetic composition and the latitude. We observed the strong genetic assimilation between Tujia people and central Han Chinese, which suggested massive population movements and genetic admixture under language borrowing. Tujia and central Han Chinese could be modeled as a two‐way admixture deriving primary ancestry from a northern ancestral population closely related to the ancient DevilsCave and present‐day Tibetans and a southern ancestral population closely related to the present‐day Tai‐Kadai and Austronesian‐speaking groups. The ancestral northern population we suspect to be related to the Neolithic millet farming groups in the Yellow River Basin or central China. We showed that the newly genotyped populations in Hubei Province had a higher proportion of DevilsCave or modern Tungusic/Mongolic‐related northern ancestries, while the Hunan populations harbored a higher proportion of Austronesian/Tai‐Kadai‐related southern ancestries.

A cyanine-derivative photosensitizer was synthesized with excellent photostability for photodynamic therapy via targeting the cancer cell mitochondria.

Ancestry informative markers (AIMs), which are distributed throughout the human genome, harbor significant allele frequency differences among diverse ethnic groups. The use of sets of AIMs to reconstruct population history and genetic relationships is attracting interest in the forensic community, because biogeographic ancestry information for a casework sample can potentially be predicted and used to guide the investigative process. However, subpopulation ancestry inference within East Asia remains in its infancy due to a lack of population reference data collection and incomplete validation work on newly developed or commercial AIM sets. In the present study, 316 Chinese persons, including 85Sinitic-speaking Haikou Han, 120 Qiongzhong Hlai and 111 Daozhen Gelao individuals belonging to Tai-Kadai-speaking populations, were analyzed using the Precision ID Ancestry Panel (165 AISNPs).Combined with our previous 165-AISNP data (375 individuals from 6 populations), the 1000 Genomes Project and forensic literature, comprehensive population genetic comparisons and ancestry inference were further performed via ADMIXTURE, TreeMix, PCA, f-statistics and N-J tree. Although several nonpolymorphic loci were identified in the three southern Chinese populations, the forensic parameters of this ancestry inference panel were better than those for the 23 STR-based Huaxia Platinum System, which is suitable for use as a robust tool in forensic individual identification and parentage testing. The results based on the ancestry assignment and admixture proportion evaluation revealed that this panel could be used successfully to assign individuals at a continental scale but also possessed obvious limitations in discriminatory power in intercontinental individuals, especially for European-Asian admixed Uyghurs or in populations lacking reference databases. Population genetic analyses further revealed five continental population clusters and three East Asian-focused population subgroups, which is consistent with linguistic affiliations. Ancestry composition and multiple phylogenetic analysis further demonstrated that the geographically isolated Qiongzhong Hlai harbored a close phylogenetic relationship with Austronesian speakers and possessed a homogenous Tai-Kadai-dominant ancestry, which could be used as the ancestral source proxy in population history reconstruction of Tai-Kadaispeaking populations and as one of the representatives for forensic database establishment. In summary, more population-specific AIM sets focused on East Asian subpopulations, comprehensive algorithms and high-coverage population reference data should be developed and validated in the next step.

No abstract

BackgroundEsophageal leiomyomas, the most common benign primary tumors of the esophagus, are esophageal subepithelial lesions treated by surgery traditionally. In recent years, endoscopic submucosal dissection and related endoscopic treatment techniques are adopted by endoscopists to resect gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. But if a giant esophageal leiomyoma approaches the esophagus entrance and originates from the deep layer of muscularis propria, it will be difficult for both endoscopic resection and surgical treatment. Especially, endoscopic resection has a high risk of huge perforation difficult to be sutured.Case presentationA 72-year-old man with dysphagia underwent gastroscopy examination which indicated a large submucous eminence lesion, about 18–24 cm from the incisors. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed the lesion was hypoechoic and originated from the muscularis propria with a clear boundary. The patient refused invasive surgical resection. Then, an en bloc endoscopic full-thickness resection was performed, which perforation was successfully closed with purse-string sutures using a novel endoloop device through standard single-channel endoscopy. Histopathologic examination showed an esophageal leiomyoma.ConclusionThis endoscopic procedure may be an alternative to avoid surgery for the removal of a giant upper esophagus tumor from muscularis propria layer.