Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer’s markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a ‘high quality of evidence.’ In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger.

No abstract

Sleep deprivation (SD) is known to be associated with metabolic disorders and chronic diseases. Complex metabolic alterations induced by SD at omics scale and the associated biomarker candidates have been proposed. However, in vivo systemic and local metabolic shift patterns of the metabolome and lipidome in acute and chronic partial SD models remain to be elucidated. In the present study, the serum, hypothalamus, and hippocampus CA1 of sleep-deprived rats (SD rats) from acute and chronic sleep restriction models were analyzed using three different omics platforms for the discovery and mechanistic assessment of systemic and local SD-induced dysregulated metabolites. We found a similar pattern of systemic metabolome alterations between two models, for which the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves was AUC = 0.847 and 0.930 with the pseudotargeted and untargeted metabolomics approach, respectively. However, SD-induced systemic lipidome alterations were significantly different and appeared to be model-dependent (AUC = 0.374). Comprehensive pathway analysis of the altered lipidome and metabolome in the hypothalamus indicated the abnormal behavior of eight metabolic and lipid metabolic pathways. The metabolic alterations of the hippocampus CA1 was subtle in two SD models. Collectively, these results extend our understanding of the quality of sleep and suggest metabolic targets in developing diagnostic biomarkers for better SD control.

No abstract

Steroidomics, an analytical technique for steroid biomarker mining, has received much attention in recent years. This systematic review and functional analysis, following the PRISMA statement, aims to provide a comprehensive review and an appraisal of the developments and fundamental issues in steroid high-throughput analysis, with a focus on cancer research. We also discuss potential pitfalls and proposed recommendations for steroidomics-based clinical research. Forty-five studies met our inclusion criteria, with a focus on 12 types of cancer. Most studies focused on cancer risk prediction, followed by diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy monitoring. Prostate cancer was the most frequently studied cancer. Estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and cortisol were mostly reported and altered in at least four types of cancer. Estrogen and estrogen metabolites were highly reported to associate with women-related cancers. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that steroidogenesis; androgen and estrogen metabolism; and androstenedione metabolism were significantly altered in cancers. Our findings indicated that estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone, cortisol, and estrogen metabolites, among others, could be considered oncosteroids. Despite noble achievements, significant shortcomings among the investigated studies were small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, potential confounding factors, and problematic statistical approaches. More efforts are required to establish standardized procedures regarding study design, analytical procedures, and statistical inference.