Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary metal stenting is the standard palliation method for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO); however, post-ERCP pancreatitis are not uncommon. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) with transmural metal stenting has emerged as an option for primary palliation of MDBO. We compared the efficacy and safety of these procedures as first-line MDBO treatment. We searched for relevant English-language articles in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events, stent patency, reintervention rates, and procedure time. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients without duodenal invasion (eg, endoscopically accessible papilla; EUS-choledochoduodenostomy [CDS] vs. ERCP). Ten studies (3 randomized trials and 7 retrospective studies) with 756 patients were included. The cumulative technical and clinical success rates were high for both procedures (EUS-BD: 94.8% [294/310] and 93.8% [286/305], ERCP: 96.5% [386/400] and 95.7% [377/394]). The cumulative adverse event rates were 16.3% (54/331) for EUS-BD and 18.3% (78/425) for ERCP. In subgroup analysis for patients without duodenal invasion, EUS-CDS showed similar cumulative technical and clinical success rate with ERCP (technical success rate, EUS-CDS vs. ERCP: 94.2% [146/155] vs. 97.8% [237/242]; clinical success rate, EUS-CDS vs. ERCP: 94.2% [145/154] vs. 93.0% [225/242]). The cumulative rate of adverse events for EUS-CDS and ERCP was also comparable (15.5% [24/155] for EUS-CDS and 18.6% [45/242] for ERCP). As first-line palliation of MDBO, EUS-BD was similar to ERCP in technical and clinical success and safety; however, larger randomized trials comparing EUS-CDS and ERCP in this setting with endoscopically accessible papilla may be required.
Purpose We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temperature‐controlled intraductal radiofrequency ablation (ID‐RFA) for advanced malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Methods Patients were randomly assigned to RFA group (ID‐RFA and bilateral plastic stent [PS]) or non‐RFA group (bilateral PS) at a 1:1 ratio. Exchange to self‐expanding metal stent (SEMS) was performed after 3 months or when premature PS occlusion occurred. Total event‐free stent patency, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results A total of 30 patients from three hospitals were enrolled. Stent patency and OS did not differ between the two groups (178 days vs 122 days, P = .154; 230 days vs 144 days, P = .643; respectively). In patients with each stricture length ≥11 mm on both sides, stent patency was longer in the RFA group than in the non‐RFA group (175 days vs 121 days, P = .028). More patients received elective exchange to SEMS without PS occlusion in the RFA group than in the non‐RFA group (69.2% vs 23.1%, P = .018). AE rates did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions Temperature‐controlled ID‐RFA for advanced MHBO was safe and feasible. It could prevent premature PS occlusion within 3 months.
Objectives: Consultation difficulty occurs in hospitals located in many countries, and it is understood that strategies to improve the emergency department (ED) consultation process are needed. The authors constructed a computerized consultation management system in the ED of a tertiary care teaching hospital to improve the consultation process and evaluate the influence of the consultation management system on ED length of stay (LOS) and the throughput process.Methods: Consultation management system software was developed and integrated into the hospital information system. The development process took place between June 2008 and May 2009. Before the development of the consultation system, ED personnel contacted on-call physicians of the specialty department, who are usually residents, by cellular phones. After the system had been developed, ED personnel selected the department and on-call physician in the specialty department using the consultation management software and activated the automatic consultation process when specialty consultation was necessary. If the treatment plan had not been registered for 3 hours, all of the residents in the specific department are notified of the delay in the treatment plan with a short message service (SMS) message. If an admission or discharge order had not been made in 6 hours, all of the residents and faculty staff in the specific department receive SMS messages stating the delay in disposition. ED patient data were collected from the hospital information system for 40 days before the system was developed ( No significant reduction was observed in the interval between the time of disposition decision and the time when the patients left the ED. Significant reductions of ED LOS were observed after implementing the system (p < 0.001) regardless of whether the visit occurred during the weekday daytime (09:00-17:00 hours), holiday and weekend daytime (09:00-17:00 hours), or nighttime (17:00-09:00 hours next day).Conclusions: This study found decreased ED LOS by implementation of a computerized consultation management system in a tertiary care teaching hospital. The automated consultation and monitoring process formalized communication between physicians providing ED patient care in the academic ED with high consultation and admission rates.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2011; 18:398-402 ª
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.