A B S T R A C TWe present the analysis of a multi-azimuth vertical seismic profiling data set that has been acquired in a tight gas field with the objective of characterizing fracture distributions using seismic anisotropy. We investigate different measurements of anisotropy, which are shear-wave splitting, P-wave traveltime anisotropy and azimuthal amplitude variation with offset. We find that for our field case shear-wave splitting is the most robust measure of azimuthal anisotropy, which is clearly observed over two distinct intervals in the target. We compare the results of the vertical seismic profiling analysis with other borehole data from the same well. Cross-dipole sonic and Formation MicroImager data from the reservoir section suggest that no open fractures intersect the well or are present within half a metre of the borehole wall. Furthermore, a detailed dispersion analysis of the sonic scanner data provides no indication of stress-induced seismic anisotropy along the logged borehole section. We therefore explain the azimuthal anisotropy measured in the vertical seismic profiling data with a model that contains discrete fracture corridors, which do not intersect the well itself but lie within the vertical seismic profiling investigation radius. We show that such a model can reproduce some basic characteristics of azimuthal anisotropy observed in the vertical seismic profiling data. The model is also consistent with well test data that suggest the presence of a fracture corridor away from the well. With this study we demonstrate the necessity of integrating different data types that investigate different scales of rock volume and can provide complementary information for understanding the characteristics of fracture networks in the subsurface.
Thermal recovery techniques such as Steam Drive (SD), Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), or Horizontal Alternating Steam Drive (HASD), have been developed to increase the limited recovery rates in a heavy oil field. One of the key issues during steam flooding process is a monitoring the evolution of vapor chamber since there exist potential risks of leakages of vapor or barrier of vapor growth due to heterogeneities of the earth. Time-lapse seismic monitoring has been one of the efficient methods to detect steam chambers. A reservoir saturated with heavy oil has higher seismic velocity than steam saturated reservoir in most cases. Thus the velocities contrasts are relatively large and we can expect a strong 4D seismic anomalies around the vapor chambers. However the heavy oil in our field is still mobile and it has been produced (cold production) for several decades. Thus there exist a little amount of free gas everywhere in the field. This means the velocities of our reservoir are already low prior to a steam injection. Based on our study, the velocity changes are less than 3 % Thus, seismic monitoring of the steam chamber becomes a challenging issue in such conditions. Our modeling study shows that it requires a high signal-to-noise ratios, greater than 10 dB, to estimate an accurate dimension of the steam chamber. In addition, we observe that the time-lapse seismic images give insights about the variations in hydrocarbon gas saturation. Introduction The resources of heavy oil in the world are over twice those of conventional crude oil. It is technically challenge project to development of heavy oil field due to the low mobility of heavy oil. One of the efficient methods is the steam flooding technique to increase the recovery rate (Bulter, 1991). There are several different kinds of techniques depending on the arrangements of injection and production wells. For example in this study, we tested Steam drive (SD), Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), and Horizontal Alternating Steam Drive (HASD). During the steam flooding process, it is necessary to monitor the expansion and migration of the steam chambers. Most monitoring methods are based on well logging but its data are limited to vertical information. Time-lapse seismic monitoring technique can measure the 3D shapes of steam chambers if favorable conditions are permitted (Forgues, 2006, and Bianco, 2008). Previous studies have shown that the seismic velocities decreased considerably due to the large property difference between steam and heavy oil. In our study area, oil is mobile and its gravity is 8°. The field has been developed based on natural depletion for more than ten years. Now, the reservoir becomes below bubble-point pressure and free-gas is release. Seismic velocity of our heavy oil field is already low due to the free gas. Thus, probably we couldn't expect a large velocity drop after steam injection since the seismic velocity of the reservoir saturated with free gas and steam vapor could be similar. This is the objective of this feasibility study to investigate if time-lapse seismic can detect the evolution of steam chambers. In this study, we tested three different steam flooding techniques: Steam drive (SD), Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), and Horizontal Alternating Steam Drive (HASD). Each simulations yield the pressure, saturation, and temperature at continuous times (every six months). Then, we computed the rock physics properties based on laboratory measurements and well logs. Last the time-lapse seismic modelings are performed based on the results of the flow simulation, for every 6 months. Theory and method The flow simulations for the steam flooding process are conducted with the thermal, compositional simulator, STARS, which accounts for temperature and phase changes in the reservoir.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.