Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) results in periventricular inflammation, hypomyelination of the white matter, and hydrocephalus in premature infants. No effective therapy exists to prevent these disorders. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonists reduce inflammation, alleviate free radical generation, and enhance microglial phagocytosis, promoting clearance of debris and red blood cells. We hypothesized that activation of PPAR-γ would enhance myelination, reduce hydrocephalus, and promote neurological recovery in newborns with IVH. These hypotheses were tested in a preterm rabbit model of IVH; autopsy brain samples from premature infants with and without IVH were analyzed. We found that IVH augmented PPAR-γ expression in microglia of both preterm human infants and rabbit kits. The treatment with PPAR-γ agonist or PPAR-γ overexpression by adenovirus delivery further elevated PPAR-γ levels in microglia, reduced proinflammatory cytokines, increased microglial phagocytosis, and improved oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) maturation in kits with IVH. Transcriptomic analyses of OPCs identified previously unrecognized PPAR-γ–induced genes for purinergic signaling, cyclic adenosine monophosphate generation, and antioxidant production, which would reprogram these progenitors toward promoting myelination. RNA-sequencing analyses of microglia revealed PPAR-γ–triggered down-regulation of several proinflammatory genes and transcripts having roles in Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, contributing to neurological recovery in kits with IVH. Accordingly, PPAR-γ activation enhanced myelination and neurological function in kits with IVH. This also enhanced microglial phagocytosis of red blood cells but did not reduce hydrocephalus. Treatment with PPAR-γ agonist might enhance myelination and neurological recovery in premature infants with IVH.

Preterm-born children suffer from neurological and behavioral disorders. Herein, we hypothesized that premature birth and non-maternal care of preterm newborns might disrupt neurobehavioral function, hippocampal dendritic arborization, and dendritic spine density. Additionally, we assessed whether 17β-estradiol (E2) replacement or the TrkB receptor agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (DHF), would reverse compromised dendritic development and cognitive function in preterm newborns. These hypotheses were tested by comparing preterm (E28.5) rabbit kits cared and gavage-fed by laboratory personnel and term-kits reared and breast-fed by their mother doe at an equivalent postconceptional age. Neurobehavioral tests showed that both premature-birth and formula-feeding with non-maternal care led to increased anxiety behavior, poor social interaction, and lack of novelty preference compared with term-kits. Dendritic branching and number of total or mushroom dendritic spines were reduced in the CA1 field of preterm-kits compared with term controls. While CDC42 and Rac1/2/3 expression levels were lower, RhoA-activity was higher in preterm-kits compared with term controls. Both E2 and DHF treatment reversed prematurity-induced reduction in spine density, reduced total RhoA-GTPase levels, and enhanced cognitive function. Hence, prematurity and non-maternal care result in cognitive deficits, and reduced dendritic arbors and spines in CA1. E2 replacement or DHF treatment might reverse changes in dendritic spines and improve neurodevelopment in premature infants.

No abstract

Children are considered a vulnerable population and have traditionally been excluded from research studies. This exclusion of children in general, and neonates in particular, from clinical research hampers the development of safe and effective therapies in this population. However, research involving children (including infants) is essential to guide therapy and optimize care. Neonatal research is complex, time intensive, difficult and expensive to conduct, and raises some unique ethical considerations. The complexity of research in this population is highlighted by the fear of causing harm to fragile sick infants which has led to the creation of special regulations on the degree of risk exposure permissible in research involving infants. This is further compounded by the inability of infants to provide informed consent or assent and the reliance on obtaining surrogate consent from parents who may themselves be vulnerable and overwhelmed by their infant’s illness and the amount of information provided to them. In this review, we discuss the evolution of ethical regulations related to research, the justification for research in infants, and some of the ethical nuances of research in this population.

No abstract