No abstract

The concurrent validity of two measures of Emotional Intelligence (EI), one considered a trait measure, the other an ability measure, was examined by administering the Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQi:YV; Bar-On & Parker, 2000), the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Youth Version (MSCEIT:YV; Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, in press), and a sociometric measure to 102 upper elementary students in the U.S. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients across various scores of the EI instruments ranged from −.02 ( p > .05) to .39 ( p < .01), suggesting the instruments are measuring somewhat different constructs. Scores on two sets of theoretically similar scales across instruments yielded significant correlation but others did not. Results from dependent t tests showed no significant difference between overall mean scores of the EQi:YV and MSCEIT:YV ( p < .05). Only the Interpersonal and General Mood scales of the EQi:YV correlate significantly with the sociometric ( p < .05). Implications for further research in EI are discussed.

were determined by assessing the performance of 98 elementary students at risk for or identified with reading problems. Results yielded significant positive relationships between TOSWRF and CTBS Spelling (p < .01) and between TOSWRF and CTBS Reading and Language Composite scores (p < .05), when corrected for restriction in range. Relationships between TOSWRF and WJ-III subtests were also significant, whether corrected or uncorrected (e.g., Letter-Word Identification, Reading Fluency, Passage Comprehension, Spelling, and Broad Reading Cluster, p < .01). The TOSWRF has encouraging psychometric properties with potential for use in busy classrooms because of its efficiency (i.e., 3-minute administration), and versatility (i.e., individual or group administration options).The main purpose of reading is to gain comprehension, however, reading comprehension is complex and difficult to assess with reliability and validity. Reading fluency is critical to comprehension and can be assessed more efficiently. Presumably, fluent readers are able to read more information in a shorter period than less fluent readers, thereby enhancing comprehension.

No abstract

No abstract