No abstract

The number of joint replacement surgeries, especially knee replacement surgeries, is rising with the rising geriatric population. Chronic unremitting knee pain post-total knee replacement surgery is a common phenomenon. Usually, the pain responds to conservative measures, including physical therapy and medical management. In some patients, the pain post-knee replacement surgery can be refractory and unremitting. In such scenarios, peripheral nerve stimulation, or neuromodulation, can be an effective option.

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is a relatively new treatment option for chronic pain conditions such as pudendal neuralgia, which is a chronic pain condition affecting the pudendal nerve in the pelvic region. Pudendal neuralgia is a debilitating condition that can significantly affect the patient's quality of life. In dorsal root ganglion stimulation, a small device is implanted that delivers electrical impulses to the dorsal root ganglion to modulate pain signals coming from the pudendal nerve. The procedure is considered investigational and has been investigated in case series and case reports with promising results. However, more research is needed to fully understand its safety and effectiveness. This case report highlights the potential of dorsal root ganglion stimulation as a treatment option for pudendal neuralgia and the need for further research to establish it as a standard treatment option.

Erector spinae blocks (ESBs) are a type of fascial pain block that has been safely used for various applications, including post-operative and post-trauma pain in several thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Pain related to an acute flare-up of chronic pancreatitis is usually challenging to control and impacts patient comfort and discharge planning. This case report describes an application of ESBs for the effective treatment of refractory abdominal pain associated with acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis. Application of ESB in the emergency room setting can potentially decrease hospital admission for this common condition and increase patient satisfaction.

Background: There are no existing practices or methods to ensure cleanliness, sterility, or prevent crosscontamination when it comes to common operating room (OR) tape. The authors hypothesized that adhesive tapes used by anesthesia providers in ORs and off-site surgical areas might be colonized by microorganisms and that culturing these tape rolls would reveal significant monomicrobial and polymicrobial contamination.Material and Methods: The primary objective of this observational cohort study was to report and compare contamination rate including polymicrobial contamination rate between tape specimens collected from storage site and specimen from the ORs, off-sites, and after use on a patient. The outcome measures were the culture reports of the adhesive tapes. The authors then designed an intervention that integrated anesthesia providers' hand hygiene and maintenance of a barrier between the OR tapes and OR surfaces.Results: The authors reported gross contamination and cross-contamination among the OR off-site tapes. The contamination rates reported for tapes from OR, off-site specimens, and patient specimens were 68.2%,63.2%, and 100%, respectively. The authors again cultured adhesive tapes after the intervention and reported improved outcomes.Conclusions: The current quality improvement (QI) project identified the potential for OR tapes to serve as microbial vectors. The authors advocate environmental decontamination and anesthesia providers' hand hygiene in parallel as a part of routine anesthesia care in their practice and agree that the endotracheal tubes (ETTs) and orogastric or nasogastric tubes should be pre-packaged with single-use tape, which can be used for securing devices.