Background: Expressed emotion (EE) being a part of the family environment could adversely affect the course and prognosis of schizophrenia. Aim: This study aimed to assess the effects of family intervention among the caregivers of persons with schizophrenia. Methods and Materials: The experimental research design was used for 80 caregivers of persons with schizophrenia. Sociodemographic interview schedule of caregivers, family emotional involvement and criticism scale, and mini international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI 6.0) were used for data collection. A standardized family intervention program involving 10 sessions was provided to caregivers. The intervention included six sessions of family psychoeducation, two sessions of communication training, one session of stress management, and one session on recap and referral services over a period of 2-3 months. The intervention used methods of social case and group work, social work principles, and therapeutic activities. The methodologies adopted a brainstorming technique, case vignettes, role plays, and video clippings concerning the topics of the day. Brief handout on intervention was given. Results: The RMANOVA score (F = 35.892; P =0.001) revealed that there was a significant reduction in EE of the caregivers of the intervention group who underwent the family intervention program in comparison with the control group. Conclusion: Family-based intervention was found to be effective for reducing EE in schizophrenia.

Background: The greatest contributor to the economic impact of common mental disorders (CMDs) is said to be the loss of work productivity. There is a paucity of studies from India that looks at the impact of CMDs on the productivity of work, which costs both patient and society significantly. Aim: To assess and compare work productivity by evaluating both absolute and relative presenteeism and absenteeism, in persons with CMDs. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study on 220 subjects (110, 58, and 52 patients with depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, and somatoform disorders, respectively), recruited through purposive sampling. We evaluated work productivity using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. Results: Absolute absenteeism was significantly different before and after treatment for CMDs as a group but not for individual disorders. Relative absenteeism, absolute presenteeism, and relative presenteeism were all significantly different before and after treatment among both CMDs as a group and also among individual disorders. Both presenteeism and absenteeism (absolute as well as relative) did not differ significantly across the diagnostic groups. Work productivity has been linearly associated with illness severity and disability. Conclusion: CMDs are associated with a significant loss of work productivity. Presenteeism is costlier than absenteeism in affecting work productivity. Loss of work productivity appears to be transdiagnostic across all CMDs. Also, the severity of loss of work productivity is associated linearly with the severity of illness and disability.

A BSTRACT Background: Community health workers such as Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) are existing resources who can facilitate the bridging of the mental health treatment gap. Knowing about the perspectives of ASHAs in delivering mental health care and other professionals with experience working in the area of community mental health is imperative. Method: As part of an implementation research project aimed at comparing the effectiveness of two training methods for community health workers (ASHAs), we conducted five focussed group discussions including four with ASHAs ( n = 34) and one with other stakeholders ( n = 10). Focussed Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted under the following themes: acceptance and feasibility of provision of mental health services from ASHA’s point of view and understanding the supply and demand side opportunities and challenges. The discussion began with open-ended questions, allowing for new themes to emerge until saturation was reached. Results: ASHAs were willing to incorporate mental health identification (and referral) in their regular activities without additional perceived burden. ASHAs were easily able to identify severe mental disorders (SMDs). For substance use disorders (SUDs), due to factors such as normalization of substance consumption and stigma, there was a felt difficulty in the recognition by ASHAs. ASHAs’ difficulty in identifying the CMDs was because of poor awareness in both those with mental illness and ASHAs. Incentivizing the work of ASHAs was thought to yield more returns. Conclusions: ASHAs have the potential to be excellent resources for easy screening, identification, and follow-up of those with mental health concerns in the community. Policies to involve them need to evolve.